The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » History (she same Chronology of) » Stounkhendzh


Stounkhendzh

Posts 21 to 40 of 155

21

Val wrote:

No (that it is likely) not all stones persisted, created layouts-the researchers.

Layouts WHEREOF?
And all-??? as these layouts on "ancient the photo and engravings" proved?

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419709562/8dee51ba/7316164_s.png

And this aerial photography with traces roads, which were until construction (traces even a few years agglomeration)

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419710338/096c3671/7316368.jpg

Roads ground, with koleyami car (camping on E. Laid they raze not later starters twentieth century).
One concerns circle trilitov, another goes SKVOZ him.
As this perhaps - touring through a monument absent, even if "not all stones persisted"?

+1

22

Layouts of stones. "Layouts", because as not originals, and elaborate under restoration.
Thus he was in 1722:
http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/Stonehenge_Stukeley.jpg
Thus in 1865
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/81dFFZgqvUL._SL1500_.jpg

горожанин wrote:

How this perhaps - touring through a monument absent, even if "not all stones persisted"?

Judging by etching (referred) 1800, there were held any arrangements, quite possibly protaptyvavshie miles of, ground roads (the favours):
http://www.vintagefangirl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/old-stonehenge-drawing-450x351.gif
. So he was in 1906, are visible roads
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/properties/stonehenge/stonehenge-research-023
If Stounzhendzh vision and implementation scientists past century, that showed on engravings?

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 02:36:27)

0

23

Val
This need to have graverov ask, why they nagravirovali so, or m kiddin (think, some of them alive and now, modicum and elderly already :writing: :flirt:)
And start all-??? with the eldest etchings an esteemed Sir Inigo Jones

Stonehenge by Inigo Jones, drawn as he imagined its original geometric design, and in its rugged reality
http://www.anglophile.ru/en/stonehenge/ … ntics.html

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419748337/97a0a09e/7317821.jpg

Val wrote:

. So he was in 1906, are visible roads


Yes modicum 806 th. Why give derzhitsya immediately after construction?

There is same plan.
On it utterly clear in sight, that Stonehenge built in place the crossing roads, one of them have closed, another suffered on 400 flushed to west.
Times there is such traces, then all another - on the Side.

Traces on all "photo age-old ago" clearly dvukhkoleynye. This motor transport. Guzhevye Daugava`s falls such not you're going through rapid. Until the early twentieth century motor transport not was, coaches, were transport.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419748812/13bbd868/7317857.jpg

And still times this remarkable megalithic monuments.
On-my, since the construction druido-atlanto-arias level of undercoat quite not strongly rose. And importance quite not in sight, clear cutting construction gathering spaces that offer universal without importance. And after all 12 thousands of years passed!
Respiration this?

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419749353/16a92ce7/7317884.jpg

+1

24

горожанин wrote:

Yes modicum 806 th. Why give derzhitsya immediately after construction?

Photo shows, that stones were already in 1906, and reconstruction over only in 1956.
Photo 1911 Propulsion
http://i.ucrazy.ru/files/pics/2014.04/1396470242_41.jpg
Photo 1928 Propulsion
http://i.ucrazy.ru/files/pics/2014.04/1396470247_2-stounhendzh-1928-g.jpg

горожанин wrote:

Why this?

Karkas (basis, the pin), on him have dealt "enamel", tip. What they "not going through every major" fully - in sight show something wanted (and not burying).
Here is fill stocking concrete
http://i.ucrazy.ru/files/pics/2014.04/1396470220_8-1.jpg
Here is the other kind of "mechennogo" stone, between the two light of posts (the).
And here in sight the second stumbling, which, too, look like on "involves forging", further left than that "Macavity's" (the), and can it looked.
Okay, if would camouflaged, so directly "something" be satisfied with, to what would this? Forgery in open not make.

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 13:15:56)

0

25

Val wrote:

photo shows, that stones were already in 1906, and reconstruction over only in 1956.

And as same SKVOZ THEM in the early 20 digits Motor transport traveled?
the

Val wrote:

Karkas (basis, the pin), on him have dealt "enamel", tip. What they "not going through every major" fully - in sight show something wanted (and not burying).
Here is the other kind of "mechennogo" stone, between the two light of posts (the).
And here in sight the second stumbling, which, too, look like on "involves forging", further left than that "Macavity's" (the), and can it looked.


????? and one a fake on engravings and photo, to they forged were.

Val wrote:

Ok, if would camouflaged, so directly "something" be satisfied with, to what would this?


DAC's same already, that tried to hide, yes too active adherents spins, if present, their brought down. Not sculpt same anew after such "rusting since the", quite perishing will "restoration" chickens on laughable.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419709316/121fe885/7316126.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419761569/e4111d50/7318781.jpg

Thus have left.
And far prime))

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419761744/4a6e7f6b/7318788_s.jpg

Last edited by горожанин (Jun 24 2017 12:07:17)

0

26

горожанин wrote:

And as same SKVOZ THEM in the early 20 digits Motor transport traveled?
The

This is photo 1943 year, transport traveled near, but not through, could do it until.

горожанин wrote:

Enough and one a fake on engravings and photo, to they forged were.

This is not suggests, that until 1900 year Stonehenge not was.
Here is example restoration, Assumption Cathedral (kind of Sabor Uspenija of Sacred of the Virgin in Vladimir-Volynskyi 19 century)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/VladVolynski_Uspenskiy_sobor.jpg
Kind of refurbished Cathedral
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/%D0%92%D0%BF_%D0%B2%D0%BB_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB_%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80.jpg/640px-%D0%92%D0%BF_%D0%B2%D0%BB_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB_%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80.jpg
There is any claims to s grant-charter to the Cathedral of? This same "forgery."

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 13:29:24)

0

27

Val wrote:

This is photo 1943 year, transport traveled near, but not through, could do it until.


Yes nowhere he not near traveled. Very clearly through.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419764490/00756a43/7319079.jpg

And on photo with construction well in sight, that a path have closed long before construction, she already grass overgrown

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419765355/ad919fff/7319145.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419765059/85f203cb/7319120.jpg

0

28

Not see roads through, there are two overlapping roads near, there is paths (can natoptyshi base coating) until
http://sf.uploads.ru/wF7Yl.jpg
A similar the and now (map)

0

29

Val wrote:

Don’t see roads through, there are two overlapping roads near, there is paths (can natoptyshi base coating) until

A similar the and now (map)


Yes, yes, initially the road such a and was! Ancient - they OK directly not were))
And not traveled. Nor on horse, nor on "kolesnitsakh gods"

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419767568/7fd2f43a/7319300.jpg

+1

30

горожанин wrote:

Yes, yes, initially the road such a and was! Ancient - they OK directly not were))
And not traveled. Nor on horse, nor on "kolesnitsakh gods"

Nu why same, if goes to costly before and after, then this necessarily "through"? Suppose, there is object mass collections (profane temple, the Yasukuni,, urge the somewhere in field. To him can go roads? If they to him go, this means that roads pass through this object? Or if is worth stumbling-pointer on a crossroads, this means. That one of roads passes through this pointer?
Here is have Stounzhendzha retained (immortalized, give historic value) one of such roads - "Stounkhendzhskiy or shop."
.
If accept what Stounzhendzh have made in the last century, then when? If already on photo 1906 he was?

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 16:13:18)

0

31

Val wrote:

Nu why same, if goes to costly before and after, then this necessarily "through"? Suppose, there is object mass collections (profane temple, the Yasukuni,, urge the somewhere in field. To him can go roads? If they to him go, this means that roads pass through this object? Or if is worth stumbling-pointer on a crossroads, this means. That one of roads passes through this pointer?
Here is have Stounzhendzha retained (immortalized, give historic value) one of such roads - "Stounkhendzhskiy or shop."

Directly through trility was the road? Hardly.
Only through empty place.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419767568/7fd2f43a/7319300_s.jpg

Val wrote:

If accept what Stounzhendzh have made in the last century, then when? If already on photo 1906 he was?

There is and before moreover.
Only with this "stumbling"
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419761744/4a6e7f6b/7318788_s.jpg

Ah and still with many - here pro the

0

32

Val, but as be with sitting grounds conglomerate military parts of Governors based in Larkhill? At Landfill constantly are shooting, hoppers on earth are found in a large his-ucts. And all of this in 2.5 kilometers Jinsha of stones! Direction shots with hand "of stones."
In guide "a monument" included? Is in Durdevac facilities World heritage UNESCO.
So no violet there khrenachat from guns near "monument"? A glitch-with :flirt:

+1

33

fireWhat there is there a hologram? And people that will need there constantly hang out (under adamant test site),, too, a hologram.
And that with those stumbling not so? Ah have made restorers so, ah and that? Was Stonehenge until 1900 year? If would, what claims, if not was, then when emerged?

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 17:45:20)

0

34

Val wrote:

fireTo there is there a hologram?

Accurately :idea: :)
Yes simply not really jibe shootings from guns (-equipped positions artorudiy can be I merely in Google Trends volume index,, they s as close to stones are located) almost in really the center of the a global heritage guide. And if with're detonating of munitions? Again on a new build? ;)
I of course not quite accept version of down a citizen, but here realistically on the door frame with stones.
Let us apply "proof of from has been almost entirely negative" :)

And people that will need there constantly hang out (under adamant test site),, too, a hologram.

And that would not bed very little people, here is you the seedling:
http://sf.uploads.ru/t/MxzOp.png

Last edited by fire (Dec 28 2014 18:49:27)

0

35

And that - UNESCO?
And the Great Chinese the wall -, too, UNESCO.
And Temple of Jupiter, Baalbek with wall had demanded crying - UNESCO
(That, that in Forum was shown)

Until druids over a great construction be - vhat not was here no UNESCO. Came would, pokopali, potyagali, concrete pomesili - here is then would with clean own consciences can be was say: "Legacy UNESCO."

And the came on increase: Legacy, of our past, UNESCO.
Freeloaders this UNESCO.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419779077/b7a61e2d/7320574.jpg

0

36

The city dweller, and here is this panorama of (2014-07-15 Curcus Barrows and the Stones Stonehenge Landscape http://static.panoramio.com/photos/orig … 340688.jpg) with what positions? And that for vybudovani? Place for bus like long built.

0

37

fire wrote:

. Similarly, the

When enshrined the hologram? And why stones podrisovyvayut on photo satellites? And what technology create the holograms was in the early past century?
On expense Larkhill, where this dig, and where go direction called the shots? (here any information, can be my sity + 32 C finger at, and point to direction).
Is identically zagolograffirovali, not so airtight - panorama of.

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 21:08:30)

0

38

fire wrote:

A city type, and here is this panorama of (2014-07-15 Curcus Barrows and the Stones Stonehenge Landscape http://static.panoramio.com/photos/orig … 340688.jpg) with what positions? And that for vybudovani? Place for bus like long built.

This roschitsu not learned? On-my, for a half-century with small offered not has changed.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419789373/7775a125/7322030.jpg

Vigorous transportation infrastructure further are building, however. Expand and modernize on all global plans must.
This OK, Hi,, crucial chakras land planetary neochelovechestva, not any get selling
http://bestmaps.ru/map?k=google#t=hybrid&lat=51.1806687492544&lon=-1.8255369532688537&z=17

+2

39

fire wrote:

and here is this panorama of (2014-07-15 Curcus Barrows and the Stones Stonehenge Landscape http://static.panoramio.com/photos/orig … 340688.jpg) with what positions? And that for vybudovani? Place for bus like long built.

At guglevskoy landscape trees either got knocked out, either they typically recognized domestically.

0

40

горожанин wrote:

self roschitsu not learned? On-my, for a half-century with small offered not has changed.

Yes, only on provided by landscape “for stones, not German from of stones. (With center stop on road, from intersection, of stones already not in sight).
Of the hills absolutism are seen slightly in side
http://sf.uploads.ru/t/rWzyl.jpg

Last edited by Val (Dec 28 2014 21:26:55)

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » History (she same Chronology of) » Stounkhendzh