The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » History (she same Chronology of) » Stounkhendzh


Stounkhendzh

Posts 41 to 60 of 155

41

Val wrote:

Cool zagolograffirovali, not so airtight - panorama of.

Not, ah so not honestly. Vhat closer not is obtained

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419791548/218cba14/7322271.jpg

0

42

wrote:

Dont, ah so not honestly. Vhat closer not is obtained

Yes, I the second stumbling wanted to watch, not commits 3500 on him (the, that with suspicion on a copy of).

0

43

Val wrote:

At expense Larkhill, where this dig, and where go direction called the shots?

Strictly north from of stones (roughly 2.5 kilometers) will town Larkhill. With his western hand, on road Packway, will had a obstacles (its difficult not discern), forth a little bit of a the west on road dig with by the funnels. Still a little bit of a west will army garages.
Pictures of the later, not are inserted into, plugin retards :(
Until so: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.2005463 … !1e3?hl=en hoppers. Photo terrain from 8.14.2004.

Yes be aged picture not will total no labor, to bury far any years on 5-10-15. (Modicum in libraries storage facility, modicum under topic same stones), and then pompously dig. Archaeologists honor and praise! Librarians putting on just to increase your stipend :)

Last edited by fire (Dec 28 2014 21:44:19)

0

44

fire wrote:

Strictly north from of stones (roughly 2.5 kilometers) will town Larkhill. With his western hand, on road Packway, will had a obstacles (its difficult not discern), forth a little bit of a the west on road dig with by the funnels. Still a little bit of a west will army garages.
Pictures of the later, not are inserted into, plugin retards :(
Until so: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.2005463 ! 1e3? HL =e n hoppers. Photo terrain from 8.14.2004.

This all well, and where are shooting, in which direction? If slightly further left than that take, there walking group cows (perhaps), on road ezdyayut machines, what would this?

0

45

Val wrote:

This is all well, and where are shooting, in which direction? If slightly further left than that take, there walking group cows (perhaps), on road ezdyayut machines, what would this?

So on tablet and there is warning when will to shoot (on photo higher "Next Event"). Still Jinsha it seems on dig, then at all in side of stones and people can postrelivat. Choking off roads this times spit.
On expense cows and camping on P. Judge only on him not worth: Shared minute away from Cruise photo as him will say. Yes and on time take pictures can strongly vary. The ministry Defense will tell there is no and all zatrut.

0

46

Royal artillery (band) Jotunheimen Centre - this not shooting-range (paligon), and a shallow, vapid center riding hour, albeit Royal regiment artillery. And the next Advent will racing "point to point" (those, who overcame swings of, knows that this). And allowed to overshadow, and of nothing need not.
There there is still "not access for civilian vehicles", which has restricted arrival civilian vehicles.
"Not know, as have them there, I not was, and have us." (With) That shooting shooting gallery (from ruzhishek and occasionally shoot) - Strelkovyy club "snipe", are shooting on chessboard, it bullets in wood go (mushroom hunters, perhaps, not strongly attend his). Here is combined Arms dig "Broad lan", here is Yavorivskyi military dig- in the scale of, not what that have them there.

And the British - Comedians - "7 th region supposedly overpowered royal horse artillery (persistent. 7th Ile City of London Regiment) Royal Horse artillery (band)) ", on horsebacks with Hochkiss yes still on parachute out of this thing.

Last edited by Val (Dec 29 2014 14:46:12)

0

47

Val wrote:

Royal artillery (band) Jotunheimen Centre - this not shooting-range (paligon), and a shallow, vapid center riding hour, albeit Royal regiment artillery.

Yes, to read need persuade was, and not on first shape of be fought :)
Not already whether so move 'em on natoptali hoof? Judging by the that betrays GuglStrit (gives date emki 8.2011), there it seems pass racing for example terrain, its feet have horses intermingle will. Yes and board could native APC essentially any. Today crusades gallop, and tomorrow and occasionally shoot, or on turnover.

And for 2005 year there it seems not too shabby heavy technique, dashed off. Potekha without shooting practice? Although in desert ski slope built after all.

Incidentally, almost all roads (self) to stones have bloc posts and barriers for barrages. Can so adopted? Well in sight on GuglStrit, and here is photo terrain there such as the 2008 year, then 2011 (those year which observed).
Zone predominant military snare however.


Moderators, if documentaries our discussion engine even sport zamusorivaniem this themes, then you can shift in a separate branch.

Last edited by fire (Dec 29 2014 21:00:10)

0

48

Interesting the.
Obama visits historical increasingly seats))
Picture taken on backdrop of oblupivshegosya megalita.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1422979138/0b8baa16/7673066.jpg
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1422979432/72ebbee7/7673106.jpg
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1422981021/d7b7925b/7673438.jpghttp://images.vfl.ru/ii/1422981054/3a8d2d5a/7673444.jpg

0

49

http://www.lastampa.it/rw/Pub/p3/2014/09/05/Esteri/Foto/RitagliWeb/ObamaStonehengeJPEG-0b7c9_1409942373-U10302866328782NCI--990x556@LaStampa.it.jpg
Although would cloth got shut down, Ange, dirt blacked out,. Or so it and need, so no one and not to steam it out?

0

50

Val wrote:

Although would cloth got shut down, Ange, dirt blacked out,. Or so it and need, so no one and not to steam it out?


As already was written, sense cover there is no.

Megalithic monuments was widely known in media in still not obvalivshemsya the form of.

In such circumstances jealous anymore-it to plug up means simply become a global laughingstock was averted for the world and trigger "unhealthy behaviors interest" and "heavy" questions to the object in a whole. So have left as there is.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423077320/2fd77667/7685581_s.jpghttp://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423077388/a0c42c53/7685585_s.jpg

0

51

There is version of, that this is not concrete inherent stake, and simply "zaplombirovannaya" the hole from errozii, that confirm photos until restoration, confirm photos during restoration (LFSF and sponge in hole).
http://dimipiv.livejournal.com/4366.html

0

52

=33= wrote:

this not concrete inherent stake, and simply "zaplombirovannaya" the hole from errozii, that confirm photos until restoration, confirm photos during restoration (LFSF and sponge in hole).

sensible interpretation.
A mixer, feel in stone "Amesbury ' s Rock n' Roll Rebels wait for the dawn - Russia Solstice 1958" and "Amesbury ' s Rotary Ladies Club also wait for the dawn - Russia Solstice 1958", a strut to not pipes flowed down "In-1959 Stone 60 have straightened and, at the same time, in order to deal with what have seen as a Catholic in its structure, the' cave 'civil its base have filled civil. Here the DIRECTLY shuttering is constructed prior to POURlNG in the concrete. "Year later, and a boy have forgery" The "restored" Stone 60 relax and civil a sea of Gravel - 1964 "otsikh.

wrote:

In the Lives of the Painters the distinguished The Troubles there is no Stonehenge.

Benediktintsu was what something deal until pagan kapisch? And if and was, all whether of what he wrote has peaked in accuracy so, as he wrote?

Dont believing more vague and dubious classic of references, Stonehenge usually not pampered star status, until in XII century Henry from Huntington (1529) not addressed him in his of History English people as to one of the four miracles of England (the rest miracles clearly were natural). Gottfried Monumetensis also wrote about a monument in XII century in his of History kings Britain. Is considered, that Gottfried was without saying monk. His apokrifichnaya history was written in-style historical partly facts, but mostly and doom fantasy. Precisely book Maxim has become source of all legends about goal in Arthur, and with Stounkhendzhem he linked colourful history about Khengiste and Khorsuse, which led capture Saxons of England in V century. In this history also mentioned about an epic magician, which after punishment 460 representatives British nobility and revenge for them Aurelius ambrosia (disambiguation) was tasked guideair of in their honor.

The breath told Ambrosias about are learning-- the giants in Ireland, where lay stones, which had held unique characteristic of the heal from many diseases. Was supposed, that in past giants brought their from Africa and placed in Ireland. According to Merlyn's, no other stones not responding this goal better, and Ambrosiy sent his brother Uther Pendragon in Ireland with army for their seizing. This task was successfully carried out, and stones took on coast, then on with in England and in a result erected in Stounkhendzhe.

In invention year some Edmund Bolton suggested, that Stonehenge was grave Boaditsei, Dolina British of pagan Queen, vozglavivshey bloodiest uprising against Romans in I century. Four years earlier King James I, who himself very was these in the monument marking, ordered Inigo pages are, General-the surveyor royal structures and rasprostranitelyu in of England architectural-style palladium, prepare for him a detailed report.

In mid-the seventeenth-century poured in light four notable books, times various theory Stonehenge. First of them, Stonehenge recovered , wrote Inigo Jones (1655). In it he oprovergal merit King Arthur, and also all other prehistory of theory only for the reason, that ancient the Americans and the Brits before and after Romans were too wild on its nature , to create such monument. And loath this must were do Romans. Next, in 1663 year, withdrew book Mr. Walther yet... toss about Charlton Plyaska giants , in which he called Stonehenge Danish in the monument marking's century, leading in as a parallel examples the Danish Medieval. Charlton also suggested, that appointment 7,000 nearby Avebury Stone Circle can be determine, sponsoring excavation around his of stones. In other two books were work Webbs journey Vindication of Stone-Heng will conquer restored (in support Romans) and the Gibbon's, enlightening thus named A Fools Bolt soon Shott at Stonage [7].

Two well known Chronicler the seventeenth-century, Evelyn and Pipe,, too, published a their notes after visits Stonehenge. John Evelyn called monument the colossal. Edict similar on castle and put. An immutable question: favorable only bewildered, as these stones were cured of here, after all nearby there is no shipping rivers, and similar stones, it seems, can be find only for 20 miles hence, in Marlboro Music School and Festival-Downs, where some of them are squarely on the surface land. Narrative Samuel Pipe was more laconic, easy, but and he amused monument thus same for, as and any history, which I heard about him , and he has done conclusion: No fun God known, what was his appointment.

In historical times the Duke Buckingham the first so got interested in a monument, that began his the study of. John Aubrey (1626 1697) tells in his book Drevnosti and folklore : . In 1620 year, when King James was in Viltone, the Duke ordered start excavation in the center of the Stonehenge, and this undermining led to fall in huge stone. This the first mentioning in literature about installation, a famous now as one vast Central trilit (stones 55 56).

Last edited by Val (Feb 5 2015 12:06:16)

0

53

Goes Stonehenge - this all ??? restoration, not forgery history :suspicious:

Yes, incidentally, took a walk in Google Maps, have Stonehenge - kamenyuki, yes big, yes several pieces, triggered on other chunks of, yes perhaps heavy, all, nothing interesting things. Landscape only a handsome, lovely detached on backdrop of pebble - theme for the working the table and only. Such a sense of a boy with pebbles he was playing in sandpit here, ARGUMENTY and is gone, and stones remained, if would not size of stones.
And so, suppose, what thought has invested, to example "engineers" in these stones? Yes nothing not has invested - even uzorchikov on stones there is no for beauty.
Children on the beach stones more interesting to do and the staging, thought in this invest.
Suppose built primitivneyshuyu there (though on 99,9% can scarcely), so can be its talk and nice build with comfort for researchers, not so chunks of scatter, let even in what the right order. That have technology = 0 (moreover that chunks of big), inspiration = 0, beauty = 0, skill and knowledge = 0, transfer of knowledge descendents = 0.
Sense in these fragments at all not see.
P. S. Japanese care with stones on many arrangements and more interesting will, if perishing borrow natural the beauty of nature.

Last edited by -1 (Feb 5 2015 13:16:36)

0

54

-1 wrote:

So, basically Stonehenge - this all ??? restoration, not forgery history :suspicious:

There is no for of filming movie The Small Back Room (1949) his destroyed partly to the tracks for cameras inch, then've come to your senses and their restored.
You watched photo with zero cycle construction? They here near on the first page themes
Still here there is
http://gorojanin-iz-b.livejournal.com/64046.html
With a hole in it zadelannoy concrete with steeply have of falsifiers of broke a, such real a healthy invisible hook with the bait, every the third after this will tell: "And bullshit this all in-style Oxygen" and leaves back in its matrix)

Last edited by avkvadrate (Feb 5 2015 13:28:15)

0

55

=33= wrote:

There are version of, that this is not concrete inherent stake, and simply "zaplombirovannaya" the hole from errozii, that confirm photos until restoration, confirm photos during restoration (LFSF and sponge in hole).
http://dimipiv.livejournal.com/4366.html

Val wrote:

sensible interpretation.
A mixer, feel in stone "Amesbury ' s Rock n' Roll Rebels wait for the dawn - Russia Solstice 1958" and "Amesbury ' s Rotary Ladies Club also wait for the dawn - Russia Solstice 1958", a strut to not pipes flowed down "In-1959 Stone 60 have straightened and, at the same time, in order to deal with what have seen as a Catholic in its structure, the' cave 'civil its base have filled civil. Here the DIRECTLY shuttering is constructed prior to POURlNG in the concrete. "Year later, and a boy have forgery" The "restored" Stone 60 relax and civil a sea of Gravel - 1964 "otsikh.

Yes, yes, very reasonably, so and zarestavirovali "megalithic monuments" with "simply a hole in it" on all "ancient the photo and engravings" together.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419210373/7e129b89/7274501.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419709456/ded63bef/7316143.jpg

And so on

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419748337/97a0a09e/7317821.jpg

Not was here no another "an ancient megalita" never, so and built with this.

Val wrote:

Benediktintsu was what something deal until pagan kapisch?

A if and was, all whether of what he wrote has peaked in accuracy so, as he wrote?
Not believing more vague and dubious classic of references, Stonehenge usually not pampered star status, until in XII century Henry from Huntington (1529) not addressed him in his of History English people as to one of the four miracles of England (the rest miracles clearly were natural). Gottfried Monumetensis also wrote about a monument in a the century in his History kings Britain. Is considered, that Gottfried was without saying monk. His apokrifichnaya history was written in-style historical part the evidence, but mostly and doom fantasy. Precisely book Maxim has become source of all of legends about goal Arthur, and with Stounkhendzhem he linked entering story about Khengiste and Khorsuse, which led capture Saxons of England in V century. In this history also mentioned about an epic magician, which after punishment 460 representatives British nobility and revenge for them Aurelius ambrosia (disambiguation) was tasked guideair of in their honor.
The breath told Ambrosias about are learning-- the giants in Ireland, where lay stones, which had held unique characteristic of the heal from many diseases. Was supposed, that in past giants brought their from Africa and placed in Ireland. According to Merlyn's, no other stones not responding this goal better, and Ambrosiy sent his brother Uther Pendragon in Ireland with army for their seizing. This task was successfully carried out, and stones took on coast, then on with in England and in a result erected in Stounkhendzhe.
In invention year some Edmund Bolton suggested, that Stonehenge was grave Boaditsei, Dolina British of pagan Queen, vozglavivshey bloodiest uprising against Romans in I century. Four years formerly, the King James I, which the market and the very very was these the monument, ordered Inigo pages are, General-the surveyor royal building and rasprostranitelyu in of England architectural-style palladium, prepare for him a detailed report.
In mid-the seventeenth-century poured in light four notable books, times various theory Stonehenge. The first of them, Stonehenge recovered , wrote Inigo Jones 1655). In it he oprovergal merit King Arthur, and also all other prehistory of theory only for the reason, that ancient the Americans and the Brits before and after Romans was too wild on its nature , to create such the monument. And loath this must were do Romans. Next, in 1663 year, withdrew book Mr. Walther yet... toss about Charlton Plyaska giants , in which he called Stonehenge Danish in the monument marking's century, leading in as a parallel examples the Danish Medieval. Charlton also suggested, that appointment 7,000 nearby Avebury Stone Circle can be determine, sponsoring excavation around his of stones. In other two books were work Webbs journey Vindication of Stone-Heng will conquer restored (in support Romans) and the Gibbon's, enlightening thus named A Fools Bolt soon Shott at Stonage [7].
Two well known Chronicler the seventeenth-century, Evelyn and Pipe,, too, published a their notes after visits Stonehenge. John Evelyn called monument the colossal. Edict similar on castle and put. An immutable question: favorable only bewildered, as these stones were cured of here, after all nearby there is no shipping rivers, and similar stones, it seems, can be find only for 20 miles hence, in Marlboro Music School and Festival-Downs, where some of them are squarely on the surface land. Narrative Samuel Pipe was more laconic, easy, but and he amused monument thereby same for, as and any of history, which I heard about him , and he has done conclusion: God known, what was his appointment.
In historical times the Duke Buckingham the first so got interested in a monument, that began his the study of. John Aubrey (1626 1697) tells in his book Drevnosti and folklore : . In 1620 year, when King James was in Viltone, the Duke ordered start excavation in the center of the Stonehenge, and this undermining led to fall in huge stone. This the first mentioning in literature about installation, a famous now as one vast Central trilit (stones 55 56).


Me already a hundred times these quotes, tirazhirovannye on a million resources, practic.
Ah and that?
On all answered still here http://gorojanin-iz-b.livejournal.com/64046.html

Scans Sir Stuckley, izlozhivshego Sir Orbe (originals papers this Sir not there is) set.
Book in academia turnover with 1925 year, when she engulfed in the Oxford library, and undoubted origin, alas, loss in ancient dalyakh in fog.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1419713642/7d0bb4f0/7316791.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423134925/e54fbd54/7690116.jpg

But deal not in this.
You what any will learn from this?

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135016/3ca6c8ee/7690125.jpg

And I there is no.
Dr. Stuckley and named Dr. have studied-described-The mayor of New Springfield:

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135076/fcaf171c/7690128.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135098/70c1180f/7690132.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135125/402b6602/7690134.jpg

And this Dr. Wood, obobschivshiy writings previous ???, plans stongendzhey not only PAD, but measured
Please

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135179/a0f4abac/7690139.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135203/f8a751e9/7690142.jpg

With any facilities these plans?
With heritage humanity UNESCO?
Why something not it seems nor on grams.
But me more just this likes - Munich Agreement publication ostensibly 1809 year

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423135242/5a27feee/7690145.jpg

Epic!
We in admiration for
*
To what this?
On vaudeville 19-20 centuries, when vkraplyalis in collective term legacy information vbrosy, misconception about Stounkhendzhe was most a foggy.
Here is and had to seram-to Documentary, 17-19 digits W. Borogozit who in wood, who on fuel-wood.
The only the general have all stounkhendzhey - they size of more of the original 1949-54 s.

-1 wrote:

So, basically Stonehenge, this all ??? restoration, and not forgery history


There is no, alas. Obyknovenneyshiy troling.
Tens of times his only in lj've been hanged, for two years already rotten his have learned well.

+1

56

When same was builds the first stone?
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6709/137106206.340/0_c4050_6cb739ac_orig

This snapshot, on which workers on place restoration in 1901 year accidentally fell in press and summoned wave of resentment in the time, but about this history a faraway from the legend rarely states in official guide books Stonehenge.
Swathe of newspapers Times were are full messaging with complaints, and demands stop this vandalism, but the first phase recovery monument lasted, not sitting, nor on that. And some mastitye journalists, such as John Raskin, with pathos claimed, that recovery historic monument is a lie.

http://art-architecture.ru/wp-content/gallery/stounxendzh/3.jpg

Snapshot 1911 year.
But themselves reenactors they make excuses, that they try to only put on place one monolith, which ostensibly fell during storm. Ostensibly speech goes only about one stone, not about a systematic more virtually all of stones. And nevertheless, despite resistance public, wearing Stonehenge, as a secret for family dark secret that one might, only gathered pace. And still big work were carried out in of 1919 1920 s

The
http://ribalych.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/4104.jpg
Not hence whether Saver? (1997, and placemark remained)
http://www.ccvalg.pt/astronomia/historia/pre_historia/stonehenge.gif

wrote:

Yes, yes, very reasonably, so and zarestavirovali "megalithic monuments" with "simply a hole in it" on all "ancient the photo and engravings" together.

on photo visible some pristine mm and, which well could razdolbatsya until excavate until Dam - and a half altitude, that then and's been patched. Or schematic photo forgery?

Last edited by Val (Feb 5 2015 14:42:23)

+1

57

Val wrote:

When same was builds the first stone?

The


And this troling was.

Humbugs made a mistake with prospects, svayav this photo and, on-my, tiny video under "the beginning of century." How this lifeline goes FOR workers?

Forgotten them also the shadows draw it (with shadows here at all timeout, they have than half hyphenated are lacking). Shoes these workers grant left sidebar, especially have right. Where the entire overnight ski boot warmers?
Of Photoshop in times of than pottery this photo not was still, hard-was falsifikatoram.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423137926/aa783881/7690508.jpg

Val wrote:

Dont hence whether Saver? (1997, and placemark remained)

On photo visible some pristine mm and, which well could razdolbatsya until excavate until Dam - and a half altitude, that then and's been patched. Or schematic photo forgery?

Edited Val (Today 17 :42: 23)


This at all to what? Who blowing the? Far blowing the? For somehow blowing the?

Curiously different phote with the entire territory facility I have greater two hundred. On each let us, za? I such troling not support. Start your with this, citizens. Here is zero cycle

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1423138240/535616cd/7690531.jpg

+2

58

Val wrote:

When same was builds the first stone?

wrote:

Start with this, citizens. Here is zero cycle

There are photo these same holes to with other hand? Where LEZhAT stones, which will need put a, with-linked to these yamkam?

There lay one flat chashechnik on the border facility, and "stones" on concrete factory to point emki.

Last edited by (Feb 5 2015 17:40:18)

0

59

wrote:

This is at all to what? Who blowing the? Far blowing the? For somehow blowing the?

Again.
The (like as believe for primary playground construction, the foundation)

Nobody betrays the brink facility for primary playground construction and the foundation.
Val, or to sign on questions, or finish up troling

Last edited by (Feb 5 2015 17:21:39)

0

60

Val wrote:

~ Message from ~ Val::
When same was builds the first stone?

wrote:

Nobody betrays the brink facility for primary playground construction and the foundation.

I type himself all coined, not I same am advocating version of novodela. Extract hence:

A here is a series of photo with ostensibly restoration 1958-64's, when the according to scientists raised on place even several of stones. But under this on photo why something visible partitioning your chalky seats, where must stand stones. And this partitioning your has such kind of, if until this there at all no of stones not was:

http://infoglaz.ru/wp-content/uploads/0c2bf4b4a306b35c886b5666581c817d254eda1399673171.jpg

Completely not she's touched in Virgin soils. Neatly cesspits upper tier accurately on draw an outline within installations megalita. Launched dug out of under the foundation. Joke whether? Of the adverse stones them need the foundation.

http://infoglaz.ru/wp-content/uploads/5989724e899e287c6fb482f9173997fb254eda1399777041.jpg

And here is already neatly turf needs cesspits and pit under stones exhumed, and can dig from holes to near in of the:

Ah and further pictures of the without peg to terrain.
Here is pointwise partitioning your as have large ditch (photo ranks at there is for 1997), as about that, until seats, where must were stand stones far
http://infoglaz.ru/wp-content/uploads/93ac4818d633c36eef3a805b1e2bbebb254eda1399752171.jpg
Here is a newer is photo
http://astronomy.net.ua/uploads/posts/1186681112_005.jpg
...
If stones "on factory", why so many photo with hole course, and nor one with privozom kameney, modicum one?

Last edited by Val (Feb 6 2015 14:13:00)

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » History (she same Chronology of) » Stounkhendzh