The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Far gone, then radiation?


Far gone, then radiation?

Posts 41 to 60 of 64

41

vk wrote:

you repeatedly on Forum incidents, that dust magnetic.
I presented the opposite opinion.

About bricks.
Squaring 63 on 63 Dam, floors 110.
760.46 - 44,000 cubes bricks with wtc1 and so much same with wtc2, like the "in dust with appropriate fuckin 'increase in volume of.
This only ceilings, not believing partitions, board to, and camping on D.
And not believing wtc3.

Edited chamallow (Today 09 :49: 22)

If ceilings were concrete, then certainly armirovany enviromnents. These are rules assemble concrete joists. Otherwise concrete ceilings simply would obrushalis under its own weight and weight burden on them.
Wasn under the decaying buildings the entire concrete turns into dust, the more-reinforced?
Where the pieces concrete a?ie?iaaiiuo panels ceilings?
Where tens of / hundreds of thousands of tons fittings?

+1

42

Шуньята wrote:

If ceilings were concrete, then certainly armirovany enviromnents. These are rules assemble concrete joists. Otherwise concrete ceilings simply would obrushalis under its own weight and weight burden on them.
Wasn under the decaying buildings the entire concrete turns into dust, the more-reinforced?
Where the pieces concrete a?ie?iaaiiuo panels ceilings?
Where tens of / hundreds of thousands of tons fittings?

)
Not quite certainly.
There is and many other rules, except you known.
For example, if lungs grade concrete’t fit on laying the more layers, as and was done in WTC, they not armiruyutsya.

0

43

vk wrote:

)
Not quite certainly.
There is and many other rules, except you known.
For example, if lungs grade concrete’t fit on laying the more layers, as and was done in WTC, they not armiruyutsya.

That changes?
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1434657222/a67643fd/9067001_m.png
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1434657187/917366c2/9066995_m.png

Last edited by tort5 (Jun 18 2015 22:55:20)

0

44

tort5 wrote:

What changes?

Though that you had in view, or whom.
Or you simply want abstract photo show, not akess attitude to topic?

0

45

vk wrote:

)
Not quite certainly.
There is and many other rules, except you known.
For example, if lungs grade concrete’t fit on laying the more layers, as and was done in WTC, they not armiruyutsya.

For LFSF under construction joists can replace a armature only in is case, when she will distribute strain on concrete. And this in our case perhaps only under a metal "lattice" (essentially this horizontal beams) or under using in as a constructional formwork horizontally situated load bearing galvanized metal leaf, as likely and was in WTC
And in is and in is case must to remain concrete elements actual structures joists, not the entire concrete turn into dust.
And in is and in is case must to remain leave elements joists (beams, either profilirovannyy leaf)

Visual, that lipnі stove stove could be wrecked until fortune dust from very the passage external physical impact. But in this case it should not be personality were or whatever-either in other elements. For concrete same joists strengthening bricks simply necessary.
From this arises contradiction:
Either builders managed do impossible - concrete ceilings, not greater incentive concrete (not been strain on him with the help horizontal failed or load bearing leaf). In this case, with big Iraq desert, but can be allow, that all ceilings under the decaying were undone until fortune dust
Either must were to remain elements Bell metal actual structures joists (beams or profilirovannyy leaf) and elements (the pieces); and jangling concrete-metals. In this case the entire concrete turn into dust nor as could not.

P.S.

Nesuschaya construction constructional formwork. The main its element of is beam constructional formwork ceilings, directly on it nastilaetsya Deck. Is designed to distribution burden, old perils layer by layer bricks. In this as a usually use wooden or leave profiled sealings elements, such a construction provides better laying the ability to.

Nesemnaya LFSF for joistsnot undergoes to dismantling and becomes one of constructive elements buildings. In this as a can be applied Gvozdev profilirovannyy strips metal leaf, he possesses high no apparent reason ability to, that allows apply his in monolithic construction.

Last edited by Шуньята (Jun 19 2015 11:10:48)

0

46

The film there is (as least one, certainly there is and other), in which shown stages of construction the World Trade Center (1983).

Still on structure

Last edited by Val (Jun 19 2015 11:39:01)

0

47

So and there is, as I suggested higher. The builders could not do the impossible - not difficult policy concrete joists. Otherwise it exposed would recent technology and been applied would until now everywhere.

The first the film:
01 :1 2 mines - obreshetka joists enviromnents
10 :2 4 mines - obreshetka joists enviromnents
11 :1 9 mines - element of no apparent reason constructional formwork joists (profilirovannyy leaf)
11 :3 1 mines - element of no apparent reason constructional formwork joists (profilirovannyy leaf, reinforced were beams of)
12 :2 2 mines - element of no apparent reason constructional formwork joists (profilirovannyy leaf, reinforced were beams of)
12 :0 1 mines - directly fill constructional formwork concrete.

And) contaminated such design concrete ceilings could not crumble in dust.
It comes) Among the wreckage of the not meet elements joists (the pieces bricks + level leaf, elements failed joists)?

You can allow, that the entire concrete under the decaying could be wrecked until fortune small of particles, but only under one condition - if having leave design nesemnoy no apparent reason constructional formwork became in dust or at quirky way disappeared.

Last edited by Шуньята (Jun 19 2015 12:02:28)

+4

48

Val wrote:

Film Ministry there is (as least one, certainly there is and other), in which shown stages of construction the World Trade Center


What the in specifis Khalezova another number of central Bell columns, than in this movie, or in two towers different construction?

Last edited by l2 (Jun 19 2015 12:03:07)

0

49

Some what pictures of the with concrete (outcome) - source of. On some are visible more-less whole design joists.
Paul, exactly - source of.

Last edited by Val (Jun 19 2015 12:57:44)

0

50

Not quite Euroskepticism subject intellectual stormed)
Was or not was in buildings WTC concrete, that whether?
Read construction documentation - every mezhetazhnoe skies of is, the thickness of the 4 inches.
This 10 centimeters roughly.
Floors - 110 in each of prodavat.
Dimensions of buildings known.
Volume of bricks everyone can find himself.
Plus animal-care, plus lift mines, plus plasterboard.
Still not forget add a giant volume of pozharozaschity, naleplennoy on all columns across perform well.

Last edited by vk (Jun 19 2015 13:15:38)

0

51

That the there pro artificial reefs wrote, far removed the remnants of actual structures, ah not steel same pulling, which can be sell.
Interestingly to know was would, where this the southern is and what there level of radiation now. There perhaps sharks-mutants know how to multiply.

0

52

If watched the film Tower-twins do (2006) the initially the movie, - there there is such frame, a truck which goes to as understand from towers which still are worth, and he honking
http://f19.ifotki.info/org/65f492ef5faedb89b03274129519c3562e1729235369822.jpg
http://f19.ifotki.info/org/b107488294061f279aa4789b33bd32662e1729235369856.jpg

Last edited by Rover (Jan 13 2016 21:33:08)

0

53

#p684,Dmitry" wrote:

new York. Place construction a new the World Trade Center-1. Photograph 2007.
As see, decontamination continues Following six years.
’ significant both trucks are waved are handled special. The solution.


Errori, of course, but immediately in sight, that you not auctioning the relations to the construction industry. Under the check-out motor transport with ToVP construction site, washing your the large - compulsory condition under conducting construction works in urban conditions. T. E., rudely speaking: Are not permitted the remittances of motor transport with nalipshey on wheels dirt on asphalt sidewalk cafe or zv parts of roads. Drop on any scene Moscow within of the Kremlin, - you see such a same picture.

#p749,Dmitry" wrote:

Of course washed, they same after all civilized.) GROUP optimistically logically. America - country the most committed technologies. Money same a shitload of.
Attention question: As, in construction a new nyuyorkskogo The Tower, must be is equipped with gathering spaces that offer universal for washing the large? (In answering question, not't forget pro technology)
9.30pm must look so same as on this the picture? Of a trickle for washing the large must to beat precisely so and under these angle?


In Moscow, in construction "Barkley Residence" washed their accurately also. Repeatedly watched. Simply, unfortunatly bugs with hose on the check-out - and not moreover.

0

54

#p55028,ZlobnyBuratin wrote:

In Moscow, in construction "Barkley Residence" washed their accurately also. Repeatedly watched. Simply, unfortunatly bugs with hose on the check-out - and not moreover.

In Moscow yes.
And in New York must be here is such a pleasant thing:
http://s6.uploads.ru/KiaTH.jpg
On every wheel on tadzhiku, otherwise not effectively, vybudovani's a big-ass, hundreds of thousands of tons weight need to project. In New York Tajiks not stop crawling.
Should be devce place, devce above all overflow in without, or fixation as on the picture with circulation and filters water, otherwise), because ???? big.
Of a trickle in one hosewell behind in logic, that this dezaktiviruyuschiy care solution.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1454519458/35d0704f/11320379_m.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1454519429/73340b65/11320363_m.jpg

Mobile point washing the large trucks are waved

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1454519766/c77e2486/11320487_m.jpg

0

55

A here is Stranger on the link released with new video
Your cast throws on most're gonna show 'em
Radiation says there, more accurately dangers nor what not represents, atoms all, Vyro., Hiroshima a setup etc and etc vopschem look.
Ranging with 34 minutes

0

56

#p66460,E-SYS wrote:

Fallout says there, more accurately dangers nor what not represents, atoms all, Vyro., Hiroshima a setup etc and etc vopschem look.
Ranging with 34 minutes


And why in quote, from?

Japan burned. Large cities and Tokyo of course same. All homes in Japan in the time were wooden, so cities were burned fully. Surprise, that on the photo - pepelnye deserts.
Concrete buildings not was, brick destroyed from fire.
Why Japan capitulated? Because on it the pampas Thousand incarcerated and have detonated the local bombs several thousands of. They shit the pants and increasingly signed. Japan itself of course not was is capable nor with whom to fight, because it does not have nor iron, nor of gasoline, nor of motors, nor production, nor resources.

And Hiroshima and Nagasaki live now perfectly, zastroilis immediately after war, no one there radiation not fears. Us been complacent about that it will 200 years on place explosion, but there is no there no much, increasingly there in order. The Chernobyl radiation, too, no one fears, all there are spelunking whom not decisional laziness and even constantly live. Take fonyaschie predusmatrivaet in hands and even on memory. Radiation, this as least, not the that us pro it say and write British scientists.

0

57

1 :08: 24 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwpaOOiuPiE
What see Hiroshima? o.O :unsure:

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1462760502/8cab9406/12591325.jpg
This photograph in madness is faring as Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Cologne, Dresden or Tokyo in matter in what article gonna put a.

Rotterdam 14 on May 1940

Here is! '.

Strangershows video, which done from photos "Rotterdam 1940" and says that this Tokyo.


http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1462761528/b9796835/12591368.jpg
And this Tokyo, to previous photos relations not has.

0

58

Машина контроля радиации департамента полиции Нью-Йорк в нижнем Манхэттене.

http://s11.radikal.ru/i183/1606/94/bacd4c61344f.jpg

0

59

И сейчас в районе  WTC  всё  перекрыто и ведётся стройка.

https://www.google.ru/maps/@40.7100152, … 56!6m1!1e1

Посмотрите по фото на  карте   google

0

60

http://www.kramola.info/vesti/neobyknov … j-snos-911 достаточно правдоподобно изложено

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Far gone, then radiation?