The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Photograph FEMA (2002 produced only)


Photograph FEMA (2002 produced only)

Posts 1 to 7 of 7

1

Photography with site FEMA. Note on date: 15 March 2002.
.
A novel photo: http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/photod … l/6027.jpg
http://www.fema.gov/photolibrary/photo_ … do?id=6027
New York, N.Y., March 15, 2002 -- An aerial view of Ground Zero shows the enormous progress made on clean-up of the site six months after the World Trade Center attack. To date, more than 1.4 million tons of debris have been removed from the area. Photo by Larry Lerner/ FEMA News Photo
/ Photography shows enormous progress, achieved on expiration six months. Deleted 1.4 million tons debris.

.
.
.
http://s5.uploads.ru/bNz8O.jpg

.
http://s7.uploads.ru/vGyJL.jpg

It took 6 months, and blue life tonus until now something works by filling.
That she works by filling, can be s building conflagration?
There is no.
She lowers their hearth from an underground nuclear explosion. There the bottom, continues residual nuclear reaction, spurious atoms.

+2

2

#p64174,ars.kolbin wrote:

TAC ", that such

residual nuclear reaction

Can increasingly much easier? For example, worse for him construction dust with the help water. I mean dust from bricks, that raises pulled.

For example wastes nuclear fuels with nuclear plants, adopted take him away now far any to I canine and to store in certain conditions many decades. Why? Because in one way or another extent in fuel continues nuclear reaction. For its neutralize invented precisely or isolation or cooling, more nothing not the others.

Dust from bricks not requires cooling and of putting water, because it in this place nowhere was to address.
In the World Trade Center was very little bricks, buildings were made from have become. Dust any, any, and sawdust and pepl, settles for several hours September 11,, and this photography done not through several hours, and through 6 months.
Blue life tonus not dust saddled with, and lowers their, or would neutralize what something evaporation. On ordinary building workers such machines to not case.

+1

3

On my view, underworld a nuclear explosion slightly more than raze not explains why buildings became in nanopyl :)

Last edited by sirius (Apr 18 2016 13:11:09)

0

4

#p64444,ars.kolbin wrote:

TAC ", under the entire respect for your version of, even times aktsentiruyu question. That such residual nuclear reaction?
How many substances needs for reaction and what conditions needs create, to was warmly?
How in this place appeared and the very a substance, and its quality and conditions for such reaction?

Version of not my, and Khalezova.
I notions not mean that for a substance, what conditions and that from radioactive there evaporating. Enough understanding, that atomic power station, this asserted electricity from couple, which is obtained from evaporationwater, which-fuel. What fuel? Yes any radioactive with which have learned more than-less relatively be governed. Options nuclear plants, many, some options scripted, some even not proschityvalis. Us say, that in a government prospects perhaps energy use nuclear fusion. That this such? Have physicists put. This death neftyanki and production coal as least, but as maximum - strongest advance hiccup in capitalist economy. Closing job nuclear plants, ending construction Gorkovskaya (nuclear plants, man-made accident on Chernobyl reactor and nuclear plants Fukushima-1, humiliating ban on construction nuclear plants for German chushkanavtov, increasingly this suggests that any dogs presekayut development atomic energy, but this not means, that are lacking amp; D and existing projects in various options.
I not am confident on 100%, that under WTC was used precisely nuclear fuel (what something nuclear), however on 100% am confident, that steel was use of the in crisp, which have collapsed the entire Manhattan in a result any astonishing cosmic. Than use of the? - nano-morning-plazo-techno-atom-nukler-skolkovo choose what likes.

In huge a block of flats building was very little bricks. Little -- this how many?

10 centimeters light Transparent Fill Typebetween behind steel horizontal upper pylons. You interestingly? Himself and i.e. American). 110 floors, Square 63kh63. This at all nothing compared with volume have become.
Concrete there was only in underground the ground, in particular box, which kept underground water the Hudson.

A far this dust settles? She after all in an effort falls and the extra on the surface land, on which constantly churchgoers heavy technique.

Dust and sawdust harvesting of the entire Manhattan. As his had? Where a million fototchyotov for 6-12 months works? There nothing. Why there? There no one outsiders not put it to work for many many months.

#p64444,ars.kolbin wrote:

If am not mistaken, right from blue machines is worth orange excavator, which something it's dripping. Here is and mixture, to not was dust (surgery is cities, after all. People loop trek and breathe)

Nor one excavator in World not keeps managing just generate nor dust, nor evaporation. On forefront see blue typewriter, sir, which leaves playground, and the other works by filling hearth. This cooling and decontamination. If would them vtelmyashilos nailing construction dust, they would have hose from nyuyorkskoy a fire system or directly from the Hudson, and here is used a special brought over by the care solution.

Here was whose giant temperatures in September 2001. In between December 2001 officially over conflagration, and in sell by March 2002 th that place continued to restrain. That this could be? The that emits large number of heat.
http://funkyimg.com/i/2aUNM.jpg

+2

5

#p64520,Dmitry" wrote:

Я не уверен на 100%, что под WTC было использовано именно ядерное топливо (какое-то ядерное), однако на 100% уверен, что сталь была превращена в труху, которой завалило весь Манхэттен в результате какого-то неслыханного излучения. Чем превращена ?  - нано-утра-плазо-техно-атом-нуклер-сколково выбирай чего нравится.


Да! Дмитрий, вы правы. 100 процентов. Спасибо за сайт и инфу.
Это излучение существует и оно суть разрушительный (растворяющий, раскалывающий, развеивающий и сжигающий) аспект Жизненной Силы Вселенной.
"Часть вечной Силы я , что вечно хочет Зла, но вечно совершает благо" -- Гетте, "Фауст".
О нем знали и называли его в разных местах в разные времена по разному.  В Третьем Рейхе эту энергию называли VRIL. В Китае - Ци. Алхимики Европы величали Ее  как Меркурий.
И эта Энергия может быть высвобождена из материи Таблицы Менделеева, то есть известной нам.
По технологии , скрытой от глаз профанов, то есть нас.
Не смотря на то что физики не могут этого понять.
Работали люди, подконтрольные бессмертным.

+1

6

Маргарита, вот если не секрет, вам-то это откуда известно? Или вы сами из "этих"!?  :tomato:

Это алхимия, дамы и господа. То есть химия - физика высшего порядка.
Использовался специальный катализатор типа КР20/20, а если быть точнее то Витриол (НЕ то же самое что серная кислота или купоросы! - не путать) алхимиков для разгона реактора и приведения его в сверхкритическое состояние.  Напомню что атомной бомбой может быть любой реактор в сверхкритическом состоянии.
Китайцы давно работают над чем то подобным.
А наши и израилитяне (и, возможно, янки) уже получали его давно.


Это излучение существует и оно суть разрушительный (растворяющий, раскалывающий, развеивающий и сжигающий) аспект Жизненной Силы Вселенной.
"Часть вечной Силы я , что вечно хочет Зла, но вечно совершает благо" -- Гетте, "Фауст".
О нем знали и называли его в разных местах в разные времена по разному.  В Третьем Рейхе эту энергию называли VRIL. В Китае - Ци. Алхимики Европы величали Ее  как Меркурий.
И эта Энергия может быть высвобождена из материи Таблицы Менделеева, то есть известной нам.
По технологии , скрытой от глаз профанов, то есть нас.
Не смотря на то что физики не могут этого понять.
Работали люди, подконтрольные бессмертным.


Что-то  у вас в разных аналогичных темах разные теории, на мой взгляд, вы не находите!?

Last edited by Нэо (Sep 14 2016 23:22:33)

+2

7

#p78306,Нэо wrote:

Маргарита, вот если не секрет, вам-то это откуда известно? Или вы сами из "этих"!?

--Ага. Щас:)
Была б сама, жила бы в Сочи:)
Как говорил товарищ Христос: "ищите и обрящете":)
Разумному достаточно.

Last edited by Маргарита (Sep 14 2016 22:38:38)

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Photograph FEMA (2002 produced only)