The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf


rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf

Posts 1 to 20 of 168

1

Simple question - if was two• underground nuclearexplosion, then why collapse both buildings goes from above, not from below?
• - the difference in time the fall of the in gender hours says about two (possible) explosions - from one explosion, obrushivshego the first the building, the second struck would together with him.
The second simple question - if explosion was underground nuclear, then why torn down only 2 (3) buildings, not chipping an (substantially) near ??? facilities?
The third simple question - where failed hoppers?
In as an example explosion has already been displayed such a the
http://images.webpark.ru/uploads52/080722/nukleus_02.jpg
Under this in a result obrazovyvalis such all the rubble
http://images.webpark.ru/uploads52/080722/nukleus_03.jpg
http://images.webpark.ru/uploads52/080722/nukleus_05.jpg
Yes, this with test site in Capetown Nevada.

0

2

Val wrote:

In as an example explosion has already been displayed such a the
Under this in a result obrazovyvalis such all the rubble
Yes, this with test site in Capetown Nevada.

You in together was mixing questions incomprehensible.
With under this? Now particularize.
Where you can be known, capacity explosive devices and the depth of attractively explosive devices, under which was incurred the kind or a different tornado? Can be in Wikipedia found? Val, information about underground nuclear trials is classified, and that they there you told them a, this fodder for cattle.

Have you there is the hoppers, but you know not that’in this place or not’quite.
Of course, that with underground nuclear explosion in New York, capacity differed, some ways, from what have you on caricature.

In as an example explosion has already been displayed such a the

in is something and deal that in as an example. Vizualization. Drew attention on the, that with industrial brought, the at all not such a.

Third simple question - where failed hoppers?

Their there is no for the same reason, on which there is no, otvalnykh terrikonov, and bulk lumber.
Reason don? - she lies in is. That stop with the fucking in issue already to lend the answer and assertion.
Nevada - is much, Manhattan - nepustynya. Soil get back a little different.
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408432935/d6dcf145/6048399.png

WWII simple question - if explosion was underground nuclear, then why torn down only 2 (3) buildings, not chipping an (substantially) near ??? facilities?

Because needless, in issue to lend the answer and assertion. Explosion underworld nuclear, this not explosion, the powder a non, this not the, quite not what you or me can be a roII in head in as a vocation. And even those who waving his crusts about physical education, is faring timber, for about underground nuclear explosion knows so much same, as an ant about washing machine.

Свернутый текст

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408433813/3d151e39/6048575.jpg
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408433849/1bff4713/6048582.jpg

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408434099/e8f88b31/6048637.jpg
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408434137/a1e62a8a/6048649.jpg
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408434238/c8676ac1/6048664.jpg

http://maxpark.com/community/2599/content/772242

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408434640/6e4a260a/6048717.jpg

0

3

Dmitry" wrote:

will you can be known, capacity explosive devices and the depth of attractively explosive devices, under which was incurred the kind or a different tornado? Can be in Wikipedia found? Val, information about underground nuclear trials is classified, and that they there you told them a, this fodder for cattle.

Vicky is written on the basis any something data, and all that there write can be test (under desire). Alone they sealed information and have written the fodder -

limousine (test) - Storax limousine (Storax Sedan) - store it underground nuclear test, by the 6 July 1962 within operations vLemekh ” (persistent. VOperation Plowsharev) - programs for studying use of nuclear weapons for production mineral, education, dismal and other peaceful goals. Into this in the process tests crater limousine - the most big palletnyy artificial crater in the US,.
. Russia’s explosive device was omitted in proburenuyu on depth 194flushed (637 feet) well. Explosion had capacity equivalent force 104kt per year of TNT (435 teradzhoulyakh) and raised dome land in 90 flushed over sub under this was pumped more than 11 million tons undercoat. In a result explosion forming crater depth 100flushed and diameter of about 390forge the Explosion summoned seismic wave of equivalent force an earthquake magnitudo 4.75 balaon threshold appears. Level of radiation on frontier the crater of the through 1 hour after explosion averaged 500 roentgenogram in hour.
Already later 7 monthson beneath the crater of the can be was safely walk without defensive clothing

Second decided repeat these things and pondered them -

First Soviet industrial a nuclear explosion 15 January 1965 year on River Dolon (air base) should was on many parameters too choking off American explosion Sedan, conducted 6 July 1962.
170-kilotonnyy a fusion weapon, blowing up on conceals 178flushed's formed funnel diameter of 430flushed, depth 100flushed and GDP 10.3 million M3. Level of vast array-cosmic in district hoppers by the end of first days reached out to 30the R / untangle, through 10 days fell until 1 the R / untangle, and in now stands at 2 – 3 mR / untangle (natural a radioactive von – 15 – 30 MCR / untangle).

And had transferred fodder further.
Khalezov says about those charges

(about 150 kt per year in megatons equivalent), which but in on conceals 50 meters below the most the lower point foundation each of of the Twin Towers

I.e. capacity within from "limousine" until "Dolon (air base)." Under this the depth of attractively order 80 flushed (in 2.5 times less, than have Since-are). But the effect was the other.
Still such pictures of the give, for 1 kt.
http://atomas.ru/milit/crater_formation_bydeep.gif

Consider on buildings
http://s43.radikal.ru/i101/1408/5f/8b36a1bc0e46.jpg
The first explosion should was influence the second weapon, distance not so large, to not trigger the detonation of the weapons.
The bombings could not to leave in side the coming buildings (as least Monika: 3rd, Fourth and 6e), but on them zone of fragmentation has taken hold not have spread (why-).

Explosion implies emit breeds (solid and gaseous), occurred same fall.
http://i049.radikal.ru/1408/04/1080ba4ef244.jpg
Perhaps for starters breakdown need was push, after which not weathered reliance, hold lid firmly and she starters prosedat (domino effect), but for such a push not necessarily need was nuclear weapon.
If after explosion was incurred area smyatiya (in force any something causes iron became fragile, as glass), then in view greater "pressure from above" the bottom buildings than above, was would prosedanie from below - as this "made" the building 7.

Last edited by Val (Aug 20 2014 16:41:16)

0

4

Val wrote:

First explosion should was influence the second weapon, distance not so large, to not trigger the detonation of the weapons.

Currencies, in here the first key mistake. Which suggests, that you not read "the original" graffical Khalezova, and she GDP 1,000 pages with pictures incidentally. Exile I despite being 15 metres below higher. So here is, "the their" any weapons be not can. Excuse, but you apparently not don essence data physical processes and technology undermining the such a weapons. Have Khalezova all of this written in book. Specifically pro sequence undermining the (why first French to worsen, in that jet fell the second and only then in the contestant tower, that jet fell the first) and the need undermining the WTC 7, with schemes and a few snapshots of remnants of buildings where the in district 400 pages.
About depth undermining the and education hoppers, then here need to understand that there is a substantial the difference in physical effects between "nuclear" and termoyadernym charge of. Moreover, in case with as undermining buildings a substantial part of energy still and fifth on heating and plavku metal actual structures buildings. Why fall WTC 7 different from the fall of the towers twins, too, written in book. Not rewriting its same entire here =)

0

5

danem84 wrote:

Don’t rewriting its same entire here =)

Don’t need to nothing rewriting, simply sweep and forget, theory about undermining 150 kt and not Symbols to the same this full Brad, for week after explosion pomerlo would increasingly being on the entire THE LATEST MOVIES DAILY and under this extremely painfully. 150 kt not plaything, not discern this simply impossible, all seysmostantsii get the gist would three push roughly in 3-5 key. Yellowstone obliged pendosov navtykat on territory across the country seysmodatchiki, and three such push summoned would endemic panic on territory several states, after all reduced towers incapable create such quake.

0

6

Glee times the db in is, that all of this "nuclear weapons" - dulloid. Vicky J.J. Cale, physics-nuke specialists's been wandering in dark, increasingly from all hide. Perhaps the world quite not such, somehow us his show.
And who compounded his the exit such notebook in 1,000 strange with dentistry? Notebook, which increasingly disproves? Not there is whether this certificate part of we have had?

0

7

SMmoris wrote:

simply sweep and forget

This most a simple that can be done =) You can whether forget and care a on laws physics?
The most a frequent one history - my neighbor (the physicist-lover, captain APL, GRUshnik - right emphasize), that "such a" not can be and this full Brad and vast and etc.
As the saying goes,, in criticizing - cannot offer.
Propose a answer 3 issue with perspective physics:
1) What force in nature could trigger and support conflagration on place destruction Twin Towers, which lasted more new DAYS. ???? conflagration was so strong, that from under through the rubble was gained the melted metal and temperatures remnants of plavila shoes put.
2) The can be was destroy 400 meter decked steel the building so, that in a result steel (comparable with, measuring JS armour the tank Tbilisi-34) has turned into a powder less than for 5 seconds.
3) Could jet penetrate Shemur beam its nose?

Ah and that concerns seismologists, i.e. such a here is seysmogramma http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/wtc_fig_01.gif
Such a here is seysmogramma proves exactly one fact - that there is no code honor storitelya communismseysmologa, and that these guys such same-controlled state ordinary people with families and credit.

Last edited by danem84 (Aug 22 2014 20:26:41)

0

8

danem84 wrote:

1) What force in nature could trigger and support conflagration on place destruction Twin Towers, which lasted more new DAYS. ???? conflagration was so strong, that from under through the rubble was gained the melted metal and temperatures remnants of plavila shoes put.

A why this not can be a hoax in for inflaming hatred in people?

danem84 wrote:

2) The can be was destroy 400 meter decked steel the building so, that in a result steel (comparable with, measuring JS armour the tank Tbilisi-34) has turned into a powder less than for 5 seconds.

Who said that in powder? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/WTC1.jpg/1280px-WTC1.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/September_17_2001.jpg/1024px-September_17_2001.jpg
http://www.waarheid911.nl/911column.jpg
http://thewe.cc/thewe_/images_5/9-11-twin-towers/myth-unravels/wtc-columns.jpg
--
http://izhevsk.ru/forums/icons/forum_pictures/004055/4055045.jpg
http://loveopium.ru/content/2011/09/2348da8d0e8b_89E0/947.jpg
As in sight on photo, steel failed very many, is obtained that the in dust, and that the whole, and closing, steel in dust bursting of the not turn, steel in explosion plazmy.

danem84 wrote:

3) Could jet penetrate Shemur beam its nose?

A I and not spoke that plane here is guilty in fix the, I argued, that buildings demolished, and beams sawed open, termitom.

Last edited by SMmoris (Aug 22 2014 20:57:07)

0

9

advise watch. Forgot add, both these movie banned to view the image in pendosii.

Last edited by SMmoris (Aug 22 2014 21:09:29)

0

10

SMmoris wrote:

A I and not spoke that plane here is guilty in fix the, I argued, that buildings demolished, and beams sawed open, termitom.

Agree fully. As something watched on diskaveri about construction's skyscrapers. There there is interesting chip-ropes styagivayuschie entire pillar and gasyaschie of wind fluctuations. Increasingly is in the basement buildings and under under / wasting termitom these ropes in + Bell failed well can be cutting an the building. With nuclear bursting of the as something is mixed, there is that I touch their hearts ways not so radical.
Again same, under the entire amerikosovskoy genesis and patriotism, too many people Congresses had in parsing through the rubble and the upstream construction, guaranteeing there someone from homegrown kholmsov has tried and dosimeters and prochiyu hell, and until now nothing not has emerged in this direction.

0

11

Here is limousine, which here already from all sides contained. "Search 10 differences"

And Dolon (air base)

Some with live stock (cows even "not noticed" nothing)

0

12

ValTo order to stop dispute long need to was demonstrate these video, there is nothing more menacing this, on latest video not himself explosion, and shock wave of in ground.

0

13

On my view, version of with termitom ever explains happening. And have Khalezova even surname iberskaya, that reduces trust to him. Ah and thermite cheaper, and NYskie Jews not such pompous, to spend together cash sake of yuks

0

14

SMmoris wrote:

Val To order to stop dispute long need to was demonstrate these video, there is nothing more menacing this, on latest video not himself explosion, and shock wave of in ground.

You that, thinking I not saw these video? Here have you again mistake, or servants concepts - in matter, there is whether in your actions motive =) Because in case with the World Trade Center Manhattan is worth on granite oven, therefore the spread of prepared waves of will occur on Different. Regulation whether you challenge fact, that seismic quake were?
Still times and constructive yours attention, that there is a substantial the difference in effects from "atomic" and "any" weapons. Have you video tests "atomic" of a drone.
If you not prichine nothing in common with your behaviour video and the fall of the World Trade Center then this already reckoning :dontknow:

Don whether you that for process education "a white dust" happening on video? That this for white dust and where table gone away all these steel beams?

Of course, with termitom far "is more plausible than" looks:

Not speaking pro nanotermit, which at all in eyes no one saw =) By the way, the only who "saw" nanotermit - this Dr. (incidentally on the nuclear Physics) best E. Jones .
Incidentally, and far same then gone away all those 400 meters steel columns on your photo? Their, too, termites semli?

0

15

danem84 wrote:

wife. well, there's whether you challenge fact, that seismic quake were?

We are d, I personally not saw no evidence. If we not believe one information, then why us to believe the other, a vicious circle.

danem84 wrote:

Besstrastnoe whether you that for process education "a white dust" happening on video? That this for white dust and where table gone away all these steel beams?

Balki nowhere not the hell are the bodies, on proposed me photo their gloom-to-wall, moreover there is a clear proof of kosogo sausage Bell failed termitom. ARGUMENTY to read pro steel prevraschyonnuyu in dust, give exile on experience in which route explosive impact steel turns into dust and desirable with rationale for on the basis of of building physical model this process in rigid view accordance with physical laws our universe.

danem84 wrote:

By the way, and far same then gone away all those 400 meters steel columns on your photo? Their, too, termites semli?

"Almost all 300,000 tons have become from of the Twin Towers-prodavat were sold new Times that he traffickers one out with scrap metal and exported in seats type China and Korea so quickly, as only managed download ships, thus destroying tracks.
Analyzed these company. Controlled damage through - Controlled Demolition Inc.. (Global leader on of demolishing high buildings). She well veritable, to over the wreckage removed and have removed the smoke from them maximally quickly.
Company was able provide frame a detailed plan for these ?????? through 11 days after destruction of the Twin Towers-prodavat, that assumes the availability of have this companies detailed information about the twin towers-the Twins and the entire ``The the World Trade Center even before September 11, (http://www.serendipity.li/wot/debris.htm). Proof can serve remarks representative: "We profits, e-e-e, in Monday, late on the evening [10 сентября]and began to work in Tuesday on the morning [11 сентября]; and only today received full opportunity process, e-e-e, entire territory" - told Tom Kenny (FEMA - http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/gvcon6.html) in conversation with Dan Rather, a reporter, I think CBS - 12 th September 2001. "Quote: http://www.insiderrevelations.ru/forum/ … topic2308/

Last edited by SMmoris (Aug 23 2014 14:43:33)

0

16

Bazil Levi wrote:

At my view, version of with termitom ever explains happening. And have Khalezova even surname iberskaya, that reduces trust to him. Ah and thermite cheaper, and NYskie Jews not such pompous, to spend together cash sake of yuks

"Your glance" this nothing and you, simply one. If in as a of argument man says "on my view", then this exactly a zero.
Far DeepBurner 400 thousands of tons have become?

Thermite this not detect explosive a substance, and an incendiary. On videos, right? Full of the video about how is ablaze thermite. Is ablaze he long and vividly, and in our case steel design fell for 9 seconds. Never and nowhere, steel buildings not torn down, us to compare simply not with than. Fighters with thermite version of compare with undermines buildings brick, panel, reinforced concrete, but raze not's iron.

For termitnogo demolition these giants, it took would tens of thousands of tons activate the thermite
http://s5.uploads.ru/O3BUN.jpg
After demolition remained 1% from moreover that was, if not less.
From / To fields else happened to,?
http://s5.uploads.ru/AHhkN.jpg

0

17

TAC "Sold it increasingly, there is documents, treaty, commodity expensive, in 120 repeatedly about this've been chewed, in skilled this empty conversation, Khalezov a liar.

Dmitry" wrote:

Thermite process this not detect explosive a substance, and an incendiary.

Termitom not they'll blow up, them budo alongside kendo steel beams on angle in 45 degrees http://www.debunking911.com/angcut.jpghere is so budo alongside kendo and poteki melt remain. You modicum figure out what's in issue with undermines such buildings.

0

18

gav wrote:

~ Message from ~ SMmoris::
And I and not spoke that plane here is guilty in fix the, I argued, that buildings demolished, and beams sawed open, termitom.

Agree entirely. As something watched on diskaveri about construction's skyscrapers. There there is interesting chip-ropes styagivayuschie entire pillar and gasyaschie of wind fluctuations. Increasingly is in the basement buildings and under under / wasting termitom these ropes in + Bell failed well can be cutting an the building. With nuclear bursting of the as something is mixed, there is that I touch their hearts ways not so radical.
Again same, under the entire amerikosovskoy genesis and patriotism, too many people Congresses had in parsing through the rubble and the upstream construction, guaranteeing there someone from homegrown kholmsov has tried and dosimeters and prochiyu hell, and until now nothing not has emerged in this direction.

GAV, what you agree or disagree, from this no one nor chilly nor feel hot.
And that means your phrase "as something ambiguous"? Ah here is simply think about it, why she here. "As something type moreover this most, me so kaatsa"?

On time parses through the rubble, the entire Manhattan was cordoned off. Nor have any "homegrown kholmsov" nebulo chance go there with "dozimetrami, and other khney", yes and could whether who understand then, that this need to do. New massive tangle exchange, if me not changes memory, earned only in 2002. Data on deceased emperors police, people and femovtsam, us no one will give, but and from moreover that there is, should, that Thousand died until 2009 th and dies until now.

That from themselves portrayed one thing the building the World Trade Center? Steel the grille work is, weight 200 thousands of tons and + the rest of material. Each section vstavlyalas in downline, each section weight in tens of tons. External box + domestic box, in which many many mines for elevators. Every floor - decked steel skies of. No ropes in there being asked and needless, muddle or be confused with '' Ostankino '' landmark TV tower.

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408801303/b9ba0553/6096523_m.jpg

Pro "podzhiganie ropes in", this you on market suckers dear, together with Discovery. In towers the World Trade Center being asked no ropes in.Termitom destroy such the building impossible. 's notice stop. ".

http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1408801473/7e57b8d6/6096539_m.jpg

Suppose consider shot from RPG-7. How many need weight explosive substances, to force through (rather), little hole, diameter of just 4 mm, in steel bulldozer the tank? Now imagine, how many would it took tons explosive substances, to cut modicum one pylon domestic supporting structure the World Trade Center.. Is obtained, that we must were watch construction Silverstaynom, iron roads, on which would, give you lifts termite powder.

"Thermite version of" was a by the same mrazotnikami. Deeds before people in it, thanks to stereotype the, which in them vbity. People same saw as vast buildings, and means themselves can be himself itself Sherlock Kholmsami, not understanding why should they this vbrosili.

Since nuclear bursting of the as something is mixed, there is that I touch their hearts ways not so radical.

This phrase moreover, who in the dark. As would this most, like this moreover, something not gather additionally in any way far click, but on-any tyknu.

0

19

SMmoris wrote:

TAC "Sold it increasingly, there is documents, treaty, commodity expensive, in 120 repeatedly about this've been chewed, in skilled this empty conversation, Khalezov a liar.

I now simply prowess entire page.

Termitom not they'll blow up, them budo alongside kendo steel beams on angle in 45 degrees here is so budo alongside kendo and poteki melt remain. You modicum figure out what's in issue with undermines such buildings.

Termitom not they'll blow up, them svarivayut steel the tracksfor example. Thermite this an incendiary a substance, which long is ablaze, and 9 / 11 we saw odnomomentnoe action, under which steel simply not was able fly straight until land, being in powder, which flunked the entire Manhattan from rivers until rivers. Thermite theoretically could be there used, somewhere something cripple, somewhere something podplavit.
Here is thermite, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE but this is more it seems on komarinuyu the boogers out for lowering WTC-2

History not knows examples, to someone somewhere was able denser decked steel the building (except September 11,). For this need a technology, which people, officially, not possess.

Who the author this the only photos? http://www.debunking911.com/angcut.jpg
I so think mrazotnik, which and vbrosil termitnuyu version of. Why this photo the only, in the time, when should be thousands of such seats cutting? - the answer only staunch: This a catfish as well.

0

20

TAC "I already wrote, me need not a libelous assertion about how, that ostensibly steel becomes in dust, let-me proof of that such perhaps in principle.

SMmoris wrote:

Patty Loski invited to read pro steel prevraschyonnuyu in dust, give exile on experience in which route explosive impact steel turns into dust and desirable with rationale for on the basis of of building physical model this process in rigid view accordance with physical laws our universe.

Why this my request ignored?

Dmitry" wrote:

Who the author this the only photos? http://www.debunking911.com/angcut.jpg
I so think mrazotnik, which and vbrosil termitnuyu version of. Why this photo the only, in the time, when should be thousands of such seats cutting? - the answer only staunch: This a catfish as well.

A nuclear undermining not a catfish as well, on than is based yours assertion?
And pro ropes I not wrote, this what the an artificer here breeds.

Dmitry" wrote:

I now simply prowess entire page.

you not getting accustomed remove the, that disproves so Ponravivshuyusya you theory, as states: "Is a master the Barin" but problems this will not solve, wastes theory, not valid.

Last edited by SMmoris (Aug 23 2014 17:43:50)

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf