The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf


rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf

Posts 21 to 40 of 168

21

danem84 wrote:

A times and constructive yours attention, that there is a substantial the difference in effects from "atomic" and "any" weapons. Have you video tests "atomic" of a drone.

a fusion explosion at all not is viewed, so as temperature in tens of million degrees splattered all over would the entire Manhattan rasplavom but on place comprise has remained would tornado with highest temperatures and nor one cel would there not red line of being able for several weeks, rescuers would there simply zazharivalis on approach instantaneously, and electromagnetic transparency wave of destroyed would entire infrastructure in New over (absolutely all electronic implements)

0

22

SMmoris wrote:

A pro ropes I not wrote, this what the an artificer here breeds.

I with you pro ropes not talked. ????? lie to already.

0

23

SMmoris wrote:

A nuclear undermining not a catfish as well, on than is based yours assertion?


The melted stumbling under buildings, as on Kamchatka in kalderakh (hearth) eruptions.
Dust, zavalivshaya the entire Manhattan. Radiation, that together with the rubble of the and powder took on Staten Island.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM3bHgTBxGo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFgxqYI28Wc

Book Dmitri Khalezova "III truth"
http://sv-rasseniya.narod.ru/artic/The_ … efault.htm

0

24

Get back a little can interject in debate. Interesting video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Myv2svTBRFI
Industrial demolition of. Compare with 9-11 and not see obvious differences. The same dust. The same the speed the fall of the. High buildings floors 40-45 roughly on my assessing. Near might floors 15. The wreckage of the although would half near there not nagromozhdeno. Yes, perhaps this and not woman the building but increasingly ???.
I not'm contesting no versions of even the most outlandish especially pro nuclear demolition of camping on K. Zero in this. But compare this video with video 9-11 interestingly

0

25

SMmoris wrote:

~ Message from ~ SMmoris::
ARGUMENTY to read pro steel prevraschyonnuyu in dust, give exile on experience in which route explosive impact steel turns into dust and desirable with rationale for on the basis of of building physical model this process in rigid view accordance with physical laws our universe.

Why this my request ignored?

Yes don't give a I on your requests. Why ignored my request, to you not zasoryali their. My themes?
I same said la Russe, postanovlenie Administratsii subject in this same section and there you better show some their physico-mathematical ability to.

ARGUMENTY to read - not up on the. More look need, not to read. Dust there is? There is. Here is on it and see.

You in his issue already're trying to drive the answer, you write "Russia’s explosive impact." No how about it "Russia’s explosive"? Steel, which engulfed in zone with first on 80 th floor, engulfed not in zone explosion, and in zone of fragmentation has taken hold. Nor you nor I this physical process not know, what you experience, mad that whether we just finished? This technology, closed, classified. What you exile on experience?
On here is this exile, and not talk less that she not about how
Code the Devil

Here is you the reference Sovpadeniya with likely in 200%they about this technology knew for tens of years until. They knew even pro the, that in 2001 suckers can be will swapping with the help computer simulations TV pictures of the.

0

26

SMmoris wrote:

~ Сообщение от ~  SMmoris  ::Надоело читать про сталь превращённую в пыль, дайте ссылку на опыт в котором путём взрывного воздействия сталь превращается в пыль и желательно с обоснованием на основе построения физической модели данного процесса в строгом соответствии с физическими законами нашей вселенной.Почему эта моя просьба игнорируется?

Тебе бы для начала учебник физики перечитать с 7 по 11 классы, а потом вопросы задавать =)
Вот тебе про то , что превратилось в пыль и чего "не хватает" случайно рассказали по телевизору, по горячим следам спустя 3 дня после 9/11. В конце ролика есть про сталь, что сталь тоже "исприлась".

По поводу спиленных колонн: вполне возможно сами эти ребята из Controlled demolition и спиливали таким способом оставшиеся колонны, чтобы погрузить на транспорт и вывезти.

Last edited by danem84 (Aug 23 2014 18:19:49)

0

27

Dmitry" wrote:

Termitom not they'll blow up, them svarivayut steel the tracks for example.

Steel very well is cut into pieces even not army termitom.

danem84 wrote:

In late rollers there is pro steel, that steel, too, "isprilas."

So sort things out at already, in dust turned or withered, and exile on record of a textbook physics school programs pro this process. And incidentally, if you have steel withered, then why can dig not evaporated, that the clearly not so with evidence base you have.

Last edited by SMmoris (Aug 23 2014 18:25:39)

0

28

Юрий wrote:

get back a little can interject in debate. Interesting video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Myv2svTBRFI
Industrial demolition of. Compare with 9-11 and not see obvious differences. The same dust. The same the speed the fall of the. High buildings floors 40-45 roughly on my assessing. Near might floors 15. The wreckage of the although would half near there not nagromozhdeno. Yes, perhaps this and not woman the building but increasingly ???.


Demolished iron-is the building, where iron with gulkin cult. Iron there, this fittings diameter of on several millimeters.
Dust - lipnі scientists, nakryvshaya not half the city and playground with the football field.
There is no here no decent comparisons. where you here at all the similarities saw?Warm iron cars in kilometer from the World Trade Center, full the disappearance of glass. Nor about what comparison and speech be not can.

0

29

Dmitry" wrote:

Yes don't give a I on your requests. Why ignored my request, to you not zasoryali their. My themes?
I same said la Russe, postanovlenie Administratsii subject in this same section and there you better show some their physico-mathematical ability to.

Why me create subject, I see lies and have grant my full its position on this issue arguing the failure the or another theory double trying to discover motives its spread of. But well, can and further replicate this version of not regard for a evidence base, I in this topic more write not d.

0

30

Dmitry" wrote:

Dust Cocktail - lipnі scientists, nakryvshaya not half the city and playground with the football field.

Untangle here is purely by my senses here as times so much how many need. In 9-11 three buildings huge and if compare with this snesyonnym neboskryobchikom mass times in 10-30 more and can and in 50. And dust more times in 10-30-50

0

31

danem84 wrote:

there is a substantial the difference in effects of "atomic" and "any" weapons

In than same? In striking a factors? The main difference (and in than "profit") any weapons from atomic - increased capacity, vyrazhaemaya in Mt. Only for launch fusion need the usual nuclear weapon in dozen kt.
Sense park Army termoyader in land for destruction buildings? First: This is so same, as to shoot from gun those beanbags for pneumatics andelectronics - wasteful and "not to community." Second (and this already mentioned): Unruly processes so clearly showed its appointment - destroyed only that need, buildings in shattered windows 50-100 meters entire, only dust use and jobs glass replace.

"The disappearance of" glasses explains thermonuclear reaction? Zinc had endured stands effects rapid neutrons and helium content, in a consequence what evaporated. But evaporated selectively:

картинки

viewpoints glasses there is no
http://s4.uploads.ru/Mntkl.jpg
Oglyadovі glass there is
http://s5.uploads.ru/cifMT.jpg

0

32

Val wrote:

~ Сообщение от ~  danem84  ::есть существенная разница в эффектах от "атомного"  и "термоядерного" оружияВ чем же? В поражающих факторах? Основное отличие (и в чем "профит") термоядерного оружия от атомного - увеличенная мощность, выражаемая в Мт.

Очередное заблуждение и непонимание физических процессов =) Ключевое слово - "термо". Основное отличие между этими зарядами ( атомного и термоядерного) - это выделение огромного количества энергии. Вопрос тебе на понимание - почему при подземном ядерном взрыве не будет характерного "гриба"?

Val wrote:

Смысл размещать заряды термоядер в землю для разрушения зданий?

Это единственный способ "мгновенного" уничтожения стального 400 метрового здания, доступный человечеству. Никаких других средств для уничтожения такого здания человечество не имеет. Нанотермит и космический бластер существуют только в воспаленном воображении провокаторов из соответствующих "течений" искателей правды.
По поводу обгорелых полицейских машин (обгорели только полицейские машины и машины спецслужб) - их обжигали паяльной лампой, для придания правдоподобности лже-теории миниядерного заряда -SADM/ MASM. Почитай наконец книжку Халезова - там на все эти вопросы есть ответы.
Вот еще примечательное видео - что происходило в WTC-7 сразу после подрыва 1 башни:

1. Обрати внимание на особый звук сигнализации - это сигнализация не пожарная а военного типа
2. Сержант Secret Service William Benett одет в костюм радиационной защиты 
3. Сержант представился как OST - Office of Special Transportation (а эти ребята в том числе перевозят ядерное оружие)
4. Этот сержант William Benett спрятал несколько машин , принадлежащих secret service во время 9/11 а потом продал. Вот как раз эти машины "жгли" для  придания правдопобноости версии про миниядерный заряд. Сержант знал это и решил их припрятать.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/14/nyreg … -zero.html

Last edited by danem84 (Aug 26 2014 15:21:15)

0

33

danem84 wrote:

Key word - "thermoplastic or." The main difference between these missiles (atomic and any) - this Funds huge number of energy.

Key word correctly - for launch reaction is necessary a huge temperatures.

danem84 wrote:

why under underground nuclear explosion not will westerners "mushroom"?

"mushroom" reprisal air flows, associated with raznostyami temperatures from rising. Underground there is no air flows. Somehow this way stems with thermal or not thermal?

danem84 wrote:

This is the only way to "instantaneous" destruction steel 400 meter sprint buildings, available to humanity.

under this not damaging neighboring facilities.

danem84 wrote:

Skyfall about obgorelykh policemen machines

they stipulated the as example "disappearances glass", nothing more.

0

34

Long already familiar with limits Khalezova on subject any demolition of the Twin Towers, and also sabotage in Chernobyl. Believe that so and was and many this confirms. Not one year even kept conversations on of Dnepropetrovsk urban Forum. There one stoned neopindos argued, that planes not punched a hole in Tower, and tripping over) Javadxan, on draw an outline within recognized until tips of his Wings.
Incidentally the poroshek was investigated under a microscope and he has idealized spherical form of, as if droplets have become went cold again in atmosfernom the air. There is such an interesting effect, Hutchinson's is called.

0

35

Рус wrote:

effect Hutchinson's

somehow through stems with its chief explosions?

electro-mistakenly static vysokochastotnoe field

all explains, only as static can be major number? (Mistakenly static electrical field reprisal permanent missiles, vysokochastotnoe same field reprisal uneven current high frequency of)

0

36

Val wrote:

somehow through stems with its chief explosions?


Electromagnetic momentum. Perhaps he and turned Tower in poroshek. Still have many machines simply disappeared door stoppers pens, or part of machines sharply's corroded.

all explains, only as static can be major number? (Mistakenly static electrical field reprisal permanent missiles, vysokochastotnoe same field reprisal uneven current high frequency of)


This question terminology, the crux of the one and the same.

0

37

Рус wrote:

Perhaps he and turned Tower in poroshek

contaminated this leave beams (and vsyakoetakoe) have foundation not amenable "be deployed", and process turning-spraying behaved from above down. Can weapon was on top?

Рус wrote:

This is question terminology, the crux of the one and the same.

Don’t can static be variable - this two different fortune const and var.

Last edited by Val (Aug 30 2014 12:15:55)

0

38

Val wrote:

contaminated this leave beams (and vsyakoetakoe) have foundation not amenable "be deployed", and process turning-spraying behaved from above down. Can weapon was on top?


Weapon what? Not raspylilis only beams in the bottom on concentrating, central same pylons all melted up,. To the same they jobs very strongly istonchilis. Ranks at on street corner termitom a bit podrabotali, to start collapse already after the most nuclear explosion in the basis. To worsen modicum and become on 80 percent in poroshek, but even had a residual the tenacity, need to was to do a thing.

Don’t can static be variable - this two different fortune const and var.


There Perhaps there is in view not permanence under business, namely vysokovoltnost.

0

39

Val wrote:

contaminated this leave beams (and vsyakoetakoe) have foundation not amenable "be deployed", and process turning-spraying behaved from above down. Can weapon was on top?


A metal, this bank from under yours coffee.
Take into consideration that the bottom, steel pylons were stronger, than at the top. This naturally.

Some mysterious momentum, which experienced until collapse, not was able destroy pillar, he turned steel in crisp, which not yet was dust, but already and not was steel. And through several seconds, powerful the pyrotechnics are causing, which dynamite was within buildings, from above down has derailed many wave of,, Army worked yields, with speed 40 meters in second.

For examples (example bad) think as is behaving Extensa glass. Under first strike it speak in property little butterfly net, but remains on place, and under the second strike - crumbles and another takes.

Incidentally about glass.
Something there arguing about how, that from themselves represents underworld a nuclear explosion, yes and explosion whether this in classic understanding of, need account for even a series of interesting moments. Automobile Autodesk ® 3ds Max ®. They magically way simply disappeared.
Warm cars

Исчезновение автомобильных стёкол

http://s5.uploads.ru/S4HZX.jpg
http://s4.uploads.ru/9EAey.jpg
http://s4.uploads.ru/Q5beX.jpg
http://s4.uploads.ru/f9omg.jpg
http://s5.uploads.ru/bZ8F7.jpg
http://s5.uploads.ru/6SUTE.jpg

Even moment, which so same need account for. Virtually all video collapse are inaugurate. Everywhere can be see her computer modeling, presence non-existent homes, causing the remaining video ("about May godivanie")
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRkdWZNCgi8

Have us virtually there is no material, which 100% not forgery.

Какого цвета была пыль, чёрного или серого ?

http://s4.uploads.ru/Xn8Qs.jpg
This photograph clearly the Kombi. What sense engage inaugurate?
http://s5.uploads.ru/QS5Iu.jpg

That for the magic the fire so interestingly dyed his policeman car?
Did of Jerusalem Easter the top-down?
http://s4.uploads.ru/D3UuW.jpg

0

40

http://s4.uploads.ru/D3UuW.jpg
On this picture not in sight left computer by. With left computer by virtually so same with those difference, that auto was make to source of radiation leftist’s front busted headlight, camping on E. A bit leftist through. Trucker the door been mutlitated. The visible back half of on right board has escaped from-for open right-wing’s front doors in moment heating. Incidentally about fueling. In sight on the roof, that no-was occurring directly front machines. No-was induktsionnym, camping on K. Probleskovye Navigator is on the roof not all melted up,. And here is far gone away bloc-oa?u and bumper remains puzzle. Perhaps from schoolchildren surrounding metal they simply, like, fall out and their was dragged away and threw. The same happened with upper seats.
And still, a sense of, that this car here shifted.
Although this the top photo likely a catfish as well fotoshopnyy.
http://s5.uploads.ru/6SUTE.jpg
On this picture note on bars, for which are worth auto under metal constructions to all. Why before bars all auto smashed open, itself on grille in an ideal able, and under metallokonstruktsiey auto simply in dust? T. E. Tearing apart machines here dragged.

On expense disappeared glasses. Not so perishing and simply they has vanished. In rubber uplotnitelyakh remained’s rump stalinita.

Last edited by Alekk (Aug 30 2014 21:30:15)

0


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » rhbnrf zlthyjuj cyjcf