The 9/11 Truth Movement

User info

Welcome, Guest! Please login or register.


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Narrative about how in a puff can be bake house


Narrative about how in a puff can be bake house

Posts 1 to 20 of 21

1

===============================
Narrative about how in a puff can be bake house
===============================

There is in nature such a force, which can keep molecules with stseplennom able, creating material Mir.
And British, scientists, as usual, give such explanation, in which themselves pleasantly not deals.

That helping sustain turn of hundreds of thousands of tons have become in dust 11 of September? - gap chemical and physical ties between no iron. As this was done?
As would nor was, the US government about this accurately without notions.

+1

2

Not can create a new subject (accept for bot), so write here.

Hypothesis technology demolition buildings WTC September 11, 2001:
http://otstoja.net/st1/

0

3

lay up NO

There, that see we – appearance of only one.
Far from the surface world until trawling.
Make the trivial a clear in world,
For secret the essence of things not visible.
(Omar Khayyam)

Find welcome this weekend’you on site for thinking, the railway, bold and decent people!
Because such remained a bit, interestingly here will far not all. But those who pytlivo looks at our world, not have about how, that have reached here! Those who entire life in newspaper investigations sought answers, perhaps their here and will find …
I promise, that reading this site, you not for good reason spend time. Sit tight. MediaPark or …
After all here lay up. There is no


, devour up about how in a puff can be bake house
(My hypothesis technology demolition buildings WTC September 11, 2001)

“Logic – art decide unpredictable conclusion ”
Samuel Johnson

Much book. Pity that cannot be increasingly download one PDF file. And even very poorly, that the author not understands the importance of the images, instead them gives exile.

This work intended mainly for those interested in the destruction buildings World Trade Center for (bashen- “twins ” and The Tower WTC7) in New York September 11, 2001. Hope, it will also interesting all people with broad to think and nestereotipnym thinking.
Immediately same want say, that me the subject interested in purely from of academic interest. I no one not'm a member on service, so no one nothing should not as until, so and after write of this work. As well as and nothing not earn on this. As freely myslyaschemu man me simply interestingly I get the until of truth in this enigma or do in direction this of truth although would a few steps.

There are two major reasons, spodvigshie me on writing of this work.

First, under an comments, articles, versions of, hypotheses and vіdeomaterіalіv about really process obrusheniy and other related events until now not was has worked out neprotivorechivoy basket maruri say hypothesis about way, with the help which this was occurred.
The main mass specialists, as a by qualified in any a narrow area, is limited to only regard, comprehensible them facts or same reasonably disproves those or other parts of official version of. Part of enthusiasts were an enthusiastic spectator Hypnotizes of building their hypotheses, which on's find themselves untenable. If they explain one aspect of events, then in them clearly not preconceived other facts. Also present intentional profanation problems. So around this issue Following more dozen years remains more questions, than answers.
Second, recently I got acquainted with hypothesis Dmitri Khalezova, which explains destruction buildings WTC with the help underground nuclear bombings. This version of pointed out to me me several neotkriveni trends for research and analysis. Guesswork, and insights, Roadmap in the process critics hypothesis Khalezova, exactly and became the foundations of that work. Hope, they are worth, to to share them with the world …

I believe, that only the kind hypothesis will-off, in that organically bounded all facts, which tranquilizing answer all mysteries, and questions; even on those that until now no one not guessed ask.
And such a its hypothesis here I illustrate your attention.

+1

4

4.2.1. http://otstoja.net/st1/7/

And movement in subway, it at this only in day 11.09.2001, resumed on next day on branch lines and facilities, directly not under WTC.


Have author there is no references to the, that subway renewed work on next day. Turn on its Majesty logic: The entire Manhattan overwhelmed dust, go rescue work, increasingly population vygnano in other areas. With no buduna there will work subway? Far on offense to go something?

4.1. http://otstoja.net/st1/6/

exhaustive information throughout in moment breakdown towers in podzemkakh Manhattan were tens of thousands of passengers. Wasn subway stopped after “misses as hits incarcerated ” and people lifted before being crushed towers? Such a after all not was

This is untrue, subway under Manhattan not in able house tens of thousands of man, only if in as a experiment and if catch up many trains (and trains in New York trek rarely, not as in Moscow).
According to contractor FEMA in direct live, they profits "on staff drill" on the evening 10 September precisely on station subway, which closer all in the World Trade Center, therefore there at all not was passengers. Such same staff drill were and in London,, too, favorite search category on the station subway, on which By terrorist attack.

But now I only want ask Mr Khalezovu and all readers rhetorical question: As can upper part of towers although would a moment,, not to mention 8-12 seconds, stand on “looked at the model ” towers, if she now will start fly by they through this dust with accelerating free fall? Where you saw a massive subject, which remains 8-12 seconds hang in the air, if from-under him yanked reliance? Wasn that in circus …
Wasn Mr. Khalezov not was able to ask themselves such simple question above, than promote their version of obrusheniy? Or this simply test readers on adequacy?

Try to build tower from raw contained sand. How many she will endure for, 8 seconds or hour? Depends on many factors, is true. Means, under right computing, can be seek to adjust such parameters, under which sawdust (former steel) towers will stand, until its not nadkolyat conventional explosives. There is in view, that underworld a nuclear explosion, had at all not drum action, and radiation, which in strictly predetermined direction eradicated molecular the link in structure have become. Known this traditional science? - in is something and deal that there is no, about this futile seek specific findings in Wikipedia.

0

5

But, as this is not surprising, but almost all researchersconfined to only runaways...... a mournfully on seysmogrammu, making sure in facts “nuclear ” bombings, and on how graduating from its analysis.

Very many now this, peredyorgivaniy, literally on each page. And blind belief in "many" video cameras, and the impossibility intelligence to control their the spread of, and frank misunderstandings moreover, that the study of "direct even when the" much more interesting, than read about ways destruction towers. Ignoring movie "Klyuchі to this puzzle", that simply kills and has to qualify author as a sucker.
An open the excerpts pro "all researchers", which ostensibly find in nuclear bombings. Except Khalezova there is no nor one "the stranger", which would was am confident in Treaty explosions, and the author says "almost all researchers." Ass any. Him spat and on the term ground zeroand on numerous signs in media matrix, which indicate precisely on a nuclear explosion.

"Direct live broadcast" NBC- switching between multiple cameras, which ostensibly already are prepared, connected with Sputnik, and lead direct broadcast. And that us have shown? - partial or full modeling "New York City" and events, incidentally as and in Boston Terakt in Boston - also a settingwith 207 mph non-existent the streets, and the author deride this Koperfildami.

0

6

1. Pie breezed right in in skyscraper with speed 900 kilometers / untangle and by vacating inertia alighted in the center of the buildings)
2. Under this he embarked on the horizon ispuskaya rays clearly down.
3. If this radiation was in the form of the cone, then from point bookmarks "pirogi" (break the upper parts of) raspYlivalo floors on several floors downstairs from this point. With geometries have author calamity.
4. "Pie" possessed colossal autonomous energy.
5. Fall pirogi with the rubble of the not Aliens his horizontal balance.
6. Denies the author shaking for several seconds before being crushed.

0

7

#p39345,Dmitry" wrote:

Try it build tower from raw contained sand. How many she will endure for, 8 seconds or hour? Depends on many factors, is true. Means, under right computing, can be seek to adjust such parameters, under which sawdust (former treatment steel towers will stand, until its not nadkolyat conventional explosives.

pile in view the, that with sudden transformation cubical had have become in besstrukturnuyu a downside floors began to would crumble and without additional external factors in view huge weight over them (weight the metals not lost in any case, and ~ a million tons continued pressed on reliance). Partial transformation not was, to keep until nadkolov conventional charges, there either all in dust, either nothing (srezannaya beam, that zameryali, has not changed their physico-technical properties).

#p39346,Dmitry" wrote:

to Him spat and on the term ground zero and on numerous signs in media matrix, which indicate precisely on a nuclear explosion.

Ground zero, he same "the epicenter of the (explosion on the surface land)" - that in this term such a? Ground zero adopt still to homes earthquakes, epidemics and other natural disasters with strong damaged and the destruction. "Signs" can indicate on that anywhere, but here is evidence precisely’nor one - nor you of the enlarged background, nor EMR, nor prepared waves of, nor characteristic destruction.

6) - yes like not denies, and contrary, points to it - the reference.

+

A essentially, as said classic: "Ty Sho the #, sho this #" (with Bredor).

0

8

Interestingly, modicum anyone was able read this contribution from starters until the end of? I am finished reading until the mid-, and me from words "pie" already grown sick (

0

9

Am finished reading.

Theory with flying around gologrammnymi annigilyatorami liked.

0

10

#p39352,Val wrote:

Ground zero, he same "the epicenter of the (explosion on the surface land)" - that in this term such a? Ground zero adopt still to homes earthquakes, epidemics and other natural disasters with strong damaged and the destruction.


're lying ground zero’s organs is’s organs is Operation to replace dictionaries
The term “ground zero ” professional, applies ONLY to the atomic blowup. After September 11, the term has removed from instructions in "direct spots" ABC, after what they began to change all dictionaries and conjuring up term new ridiculous meaning.
http://www.clubvi.ru/news/2012/11/11/dokole//index_files/image011.jpg

"Signs" can indicate on that anywhere, but here is evidence precisely’nor one - nor you of the enlarged background, nor EMR, nor prepared waves of, nor characteristic destruction.

There is no not on that anywhere, and strictly either on a nuclear explosion, either on non-obvious us energy 911.. Coincidentally with likely in 200%
nor you of the enlarged background- where know?
nor EMR- where know?
nor prepared waves of- 's soil, as and another.
nor characteristic destruction- where you can be known "characteristic destruction"? Not believe, that you participated in trials an underground explosion precisely with these characteristics, which, too, you unknown.

You gave stereotipnuyu facility, that a nuclear explosion this necessarily "shock wave of", but this not fact, this from area us unknown, even for those, whom in universities vdolbili laws Newton and Einstein.

Plutonium-239 size of with egg and weight in 8 kg, could destroy city. Our brains in able this understand? This something fantastic, not ukladyvayuschiesya in anybody, nevertheless this "miracle" there is. So why same not to believe, that there is and other "miracles" about existence of which we even not even guess?

+1

11

#p39373,Леонид Ильич wrote:

the circle of with flying around gologrammnymi annigilyatorami liked.

Ah here is precisely. The entire theory find room in 2 phrase.
1. Three towers WTC were torn down three annigilyatorami.
2. Two of these annigilyatorov were flying around and during bombers be breeding animals the hologram plane, and a third - stationary.

Increasingly! Why so much water.

0

12

Reading analytics on 9 / 11 everywhere say, that WTC7 himself fell, and on our TV in that day clearly talked, that this verified demolition of, ostensibly the building damaged and could collapse on neighboring buildings. Here is how now. Maybe, you remember that evening.

0

13

#p39375,Dmitry" wrote:

're lying

Don’t mean such habits. "That me gave, then I and of mixed up," (with).
This the use of gz stems with professional importance phrases? Love from Ground Zero, 1998 (the film vypilyan from ru-sector, Love from Ground Zero)
And have these comrades - ground zero media, article are beginning with catastrophe Boeing 747, 17 July 1996. And at all site have them can be, alternative on subject mimic term. There is have them and speculative piece pro 14 years after 911 - nothing pro gz.
And Quake II: Ground Zero, 1998?
And faster '’ s interiors like to be at ground zero during an future.A?
And here - "A Fault Runs Through It."
nor you of the enlarged background - where know?- Where is data about increase level cosmic? Where data about evacuation vza the limits 30i kilometer (zone, where zone alienation?
nor EMR - where know?- Where is data about, er, interference and failures take place?
nor prepared waves of - 's soil, as and another.- Why not have suffered cellar exposure?
nor characteristic destruction - where you can be known "characteristic destruction"?- Got a visit from him lessons GO, watched kinushki on Yu-pipe.

#p39375,Dmitry" wrote:

not believe, that you participated in trials an underground explosion precisely with these characteristics, which, too, you unknown.

Don’t need to participate, enough study sheets. There is sheets about conducted trials, there is results these tests, and here is reports with twin outcomes commercial reference 09 / 11 there is no. Hide? - Perhaps, but this not suggests, that they were, they could be, exactly with so same success, as and could not be (that on this stage more likely). Will such sheets, will required results, then can be about than something argue, otherwise this simply "to talk to the in the smoking room."

#p39375,Dmitry" wrote:

year gave stereotipnuyu facility, that a nuclear explosion this necessarily "shock wave of", but this not fact, this from area us unknown, even for those, whom in universities vdolbili laws Newton and Einstein.

As not will evidence to the contrary, this ??? fact. There is evidence run by nuclear explosion? - give watch.

#p39375,Dmitry" wrote:

Plutonium-239 size of with egg and weight in 8 kg, could destroy city. Our brains in able this understand? This something fantastic, not ukladyvayuschiesya in anybody, nevertheless this "miracle" there is. So why same not to believe, that there is and other "miracles" about existence of which we even not even guess?

A what would not unique activities occurring once, all behind. As times the, that’demolition of would Manhattan it is likely under Network, and here is "aimed and a rigged"’until (without evidence) not behind.

0

14

#p39381,Dynamik wrote:

summarizing the analytics on 9 / 11 everywhere say, that WTC7 himself fell, and on our TV in that day clearly talked, that this verified demolition of, ostensibly the building damaged and could collapse on neighboring buildings. Here is how now. Maybe, you remember that evening.


Many information here
http://images.vfl.ru/ii/1442952821/399ae8af/9964494_m.jpg

With subtitles

Not'm just commenting, himself until not watched. Of weathering couple of days, can be will 'Market on how Forum (if before here not anodyne):
Arkhitektory and engineers about 9-11

0

15

#p39395,Val wrote:

nor EMR - where know? - Where is data about, er, interference and failures take place?
Nor prepared waves of - 's soil, as and another. - Why not have suffered cellar exposure?

Ah pro EMR can be suggest, that Iron frame redounded screen, i.e. momentum could and be, but on grille supporting structure zazemlennaya his must was weaken, how - not know.

And pro cellar exposure - where? Photo in studio, please.

+1

16

Вот очень интересная версия,кто терпеливый и любознательный может прочитать... http://otstoja.net/st1/

+1

17

#p39381,Dynamik wrote:

Читая аналитику по 9/11 везде говорят, что WTC7 сам упал, а по нашему ТВ в тот день четко говорили, что это контролируемый снос, якобы здание повреждено и может рухнуть на соседние здания. Вот как щас помню тот вечер.

Ну конечно контролируемый снос, даже очень "контролируемый" или кто-то верит до сих пор в сантеклауса? :)

+1

18

#p135541,вадимломиковский wrote:

немного анализа по разрушениям 911-халезов не прав    http://otstoja.net/st1/


Коротко- вся теория строится на том, что в башни действительно что-то попало/влетело внутрь. А дальше лепи, что хочешь, сколько фантазии хватит.

Тем не менее, остаётся вопрос, какими именно носителями были доставлены к стенам башен голограммы самолётов?..
   Придётся признать, что данный носитель не имеет аналогов в авиации… Выходит, что снизу и сбоку наблюдатели видели образ, очень похожий на самолёт, а сверху у этой штуки не было голографической маскировки, поэтому её и увидели в настоящем обличье – как сплюснутый шар.

Другой факт, который доказывает версию мгновенного разогрева материи вокруг влетающего в башню «пирожка» – форма пролома. Но совершенно очевидно, что кончики крыльев настоящего самолёта вообще не смогли бы пробить даже толстые алюминиевые накладки, не говоря уже о боковых стенках стальных колонн внешнего каркаса 6-сантиметровой толщины
       А вот если принять версию предельно разогретой области в форме самолёта вокруг перемещающегося «пирожка», форма пролома получает очень наглядное объяснение. Если конфигурация этой области равна объёму голограммы показанного публике «самолёта», получится именно такая форма пролома, как и получилась… Если «пирожок» умеет превращать в пыль любые вещества с огромной скоростью, тогда почему мы будем отказывать ему в умении получать в заданной области вокруг себя нужную температуру? К примеру, современные истребители-перехватчики тоже умеют делать очень разные вещи, причём одновременно. Нас же это не удивляет…

0

19

#p135638,вадимломиковский wrote:

в здания что то таки врезалось -люди это видели -судя по их реакции на звук


Ну это реальные пруфы нужны на основе видео и фотоматериалов "в здания что то таки врезалось"

#p135638,вадимломиковский wrote:

ну а версия о ядерном взриве слишком маловероятно -обрушение шло сверху да и третье здание явно не ядерний


Какая принципиальная разница= что применили - ядерный боеприпас или спецустройство с применением ядерных технологий или иных технологий с такой же мощностью.
Если есть мозги и знания в этой сфере, то можешь заниматься расследованием. Не кто не запрещает. Собери данные о радиации в зоне ВТЦ и ну так далее.

0

20

#p135638,вадимломиковский wrote:

про анализ пыли с башен


Авторы исследуют красно-серые частицы, которые были найдены во всех собранных образцах.
0.1% от общей массы. Очень тщательно исследуют. С фото, диаграммами и пр. Результат- железо, алюм, кремний и углерод.

Итак, не менее 99.9% массы пыли, образовавшейся вследствие разрушения зданий WTC, не содержит химических элементов (или их базовых комбинаций), из которых были построены эти здания!


А остатки пыли почему то пропускают и определяют состав на глазок.

Но оставался вопрос, во что именно превратились все материалы башен за те 9 секунд полёта к земле с ускорением свободного падения.
       Ответ на этот вопрос, собственно, и даёт рассматриваемая статья. Оказывается, материал, в который «пирожки» превращали здания WTC, является углеродом! Отталкиваясь от этого вывода, можно легко решить все загадки пыли: мелкодисперсность, нетоксичность, цвет, отсутствие запаха и магнитных свойств. Точный процент чистого углерода в пыли назвать сложно, но я предполагаю, что его количество не менее 85-90% по массе.

+1


You are here » The 9/11 Truth Movement » Demolition of World Trade Center for » Narrative about how in a puff can be bake house